Associations between modifiable risk factors and frailty progression among individuals with pre-frailty
Lanzhi Duan,Mengmeng Xiao,Sijia Liu,Zhigang Wu,Ruzhao Chen,Rui Zeng,Fayi Xie,Dongmei Ye,Wan Zhu,Yueyue Zhao,Wei Li,Jiang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2024.112494
Abstract:Background: In the context of the present global aging phenomenon, the senior population and pace of aging in China have emerged as prominent issues on the worldwide stage. Frailty, a complicated condition that is closely linked to the clinical syndrome of advancing age, poses a considerable health risk to older individuals. Frailty status was assessed by the frailty index (FI) ranging from 0 to 1, pre-frailty was defined as >0.10 to <0.25, and frailty was defined as ≥0.25. To look at the connection between modifiable risk factors and frailty progression among individuals in the pre-frailty population. Methods: Using pre-frailty patients as characterized by the 32-frailty index, the study focused on middle-aged and elderly persons from China and ultimately recruited 5,411 participants for analysis. The relationship between modifiable factors and changes in pre-frailty status throughout follow-up was investigated. Modifiable factors were body mass index (BMI), abdominal obesity, smoking status, alcohol use, and sleep status. We employed logistic regression to examine the relationships between modifiable risk factors and changes in pre-frailty status, as well as the associations between modifiable factors scores and the corresponding pre-frailty progression. Additionally, we generated the modifiable factors scores and examined how these related to modifications in the pre-frailty stage. Results: In this study, after a mean follow-up of 6 years, (OR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.48-0.71) for BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and (OR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.63-0.89) for concomitant abdominal obesity were significantly associated with lower reversal to a healthy state; (OR = 1.24, 95%CI:1.07-1.44) and (OR = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.10-1.42) for the group that negatively progressed further to frailty were significantly associated with increased frailty progression profile. Subsequently, investigation of modifiable factor scores and changes of pre-frailty status found that as scores increased further, frailty developed (OR = 1.12, 95%CI:1.05-1.18), with scores of 3 and 4 of (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.08-1.77) and (OR = 1.52, 95%CI:1.09-2.14). Finally, we also performed a series of stratified analyses and found that rural unmarried men aged 45 to 60 years with less than a high school degree were more likely to develop a frailty state once they developed abdominal obesity. Conclusion: In pre-frailty individuals, maintaining more favorable controllable variables considerably enhances the chance of return to normal and, conversely, increase the risk of progressing to the frailty.