Intersectional analysis of inequalities in self-reported breast cancer screening attendance using supervised machine learning and PROGRESS-Plus framework
Núria Pedrós Barnils,Benjamin Schüz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1332277
IF: 5.2
2024-01-05
Frontiers in Public Health
Abstract:Background Breast cancer is a critical public health concern in Spain, and organized screening programs have been in place since the 1990s to reduce its incidence. However, despite the bi-annual invitation for breast cancer screening (BCS) for women aged 45–69, significant attendance inequalities persist among different population groups. This study employs a quantitative intersectional perspective to identify intersectional positions at risk of not undergoing breast cancer screening in Spain. Methods Women were selected from the 2020 European Health Interview Survey in Spain, which surveyed the adult population (> 15 years old) living in private households ( N = 22,072; 59% response rate). Inequality indicators based on the PROGRESS-Plus framework were used to disentangle existing social intersections. To identify intersectional groups, decision tree models, including classification and regression trees (CARTs), chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID), conditional inference rees (CITs), and C5.0, along with an ensemble algorithm, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were applied. Results XGBoost (AUC 78.8%) identified regional differences (Autonomous Community) as the most important factor for classifying BCS attendance, followed by education, age, and marital status. The C5.0 model (balanced accuracy 81.1%) highlighted that the relative importance of individual characteristics, such as education, marital status, or age, for attendance differs based on women’s place of residence and their degree of interaction. The highest risk of not attending BCS was observed among illiterate older women in lower social classes who were born in Spain, were residing in Asturias, Cantabria, Basque Country, Castile and León, Extremadura, Galicia, Madrid, Murcia, La Rioja, or Valencian Community, and were married, divorced, or widowed. Subsequently, the risk of not attending BCS extends to three other groups of women: women living in Ceuta and Melilla; single or legally separated women living in the rest of Spain; and women not born in Spain who were married, divorced, or widowed and not residing in Ceuta or Melilla. Conclusion The combined use of decision trees and ensemble algorithms can be a valuable tool in identifying intersectional positions at a higher risk of not utilizing public resources and, thus, can aid substantially in developing targeted interventions to increase BCS attendance.
public, environmental & occupational health