Abstract:Abstract Background There exist many different methods of allocating participants to treatment groups during a randomised controlled trial. Although there is research that explores trial characteristics that are associated with the choice of method, there is still a lot of variety in practice not explained. This study used qualitative methods to explore more deeply the motivations behind researchers’ choice of randomisation, and which features of the method they use to evaluate the performance of these methods. Methods Data was collected from online focus groups with various stakeholders involved in the randomisation process. Focus groups were recorded and then transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcripts. Results Twenty-five participants from twenty clinical trials units across the UK were recruited to take part in one of four focus groups. Four main themes were identified: how randomisation methods are selected; researchers’ opinions of the different methods; which features of the method are desirable and ways to measure method features. Most researchers agree that the randomisation method should be selected based on key trial characteristics; however, for many, a unit standard is in place. Opinions of methods were varied with some participants favouring stratified blocks and others favouring minimisation. This was generally due to researchers’ perception of the effect these methods had on balance and predictability. Generally, predictability was considered more important than balance as adjustments cannot be made for it; however, most researchers felt that the importance of these two methods was dependent on the design of the study. Balance is usually evaluated by tabulating variables by treatment arm and looking for perceived imbalances, predictability was generally considered much harder to measure, partly due to differing definitions. Conclusion There is a wide variety in practice on how randomisation methods are selected and researcher’s opinions on methods. The difference in practice observed when looking at randomisation method selection can be explained by a difference in unit practice, and also by a difference in researchers prioritisation of balance and predictability. The findings of this study show a need for more guidance on randomisation method selection.

Treatment randomisation at animal or pen level?

Methods for applying blinding and randomisation in animal experiments

On Preparing a List of Random treatment Assigns

Abstract 2829: Strategies to overcome challenges in randomization and grouping methodologies in in vivo studies using the power of animal study workflow software

Heterogeneity of animal experiments and how to deal with it

Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study

Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects under Actual Conditions of Use.

What is the optimum design for my animal experiment?

The probabilities of an outcome on intervention and control can be estimated by randomizing subjects to different testing strategies, required for assessing diagnostic tests, test trace and isolation and for natural randomisation

Clinical Trials in Veterinary Medicine: A New Era Brings New Challenges

Improving basic and translational science by accounting for litter-to-litter variation in animal models

Importance of Block Randomization When Designing Proteomics Experiments

Exploring Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials When Some of the Patients are Treated against the Randomization

General Principles, Designs, and Statistical Analyses in Experimental Animal Studies

Disentangling Treatment and Placebo Effects in Randomized Experiments Using Principal Stratification-An Introduction

Why Experimenters Might Not Always Want to Randomize, and What They Could Do Instead

Using pairwise randomisation to reduce the risk of bias

Half the price, twice the gain: How to simultaneously decrease animal numbers and increase precision with good experimental design

Randomization inference for treatment effect variation

Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies

Practical Aspects of Experimental Design in Animal Research