Abstract:In addition domestic R&D investment,China has been relying on international R&D spillovers from the developed country to grow its economy.International spillovers consist of international trade,foreign direct investment(FDI),and direct(intangible) spillovers.Intangible spillovers include reverse engineering,students returning from foreign countries,dialog between academic researchers,information exchange through electronic means,academic journals,and international conferences,and so on.Researchers begin paying attention to direct R&D spillovers in addition to trade and FDI. Based on Coe and Helpman's(1995) proposed model,we evaluate the contribution of domestic and direct foreign R&D stocks to the total factor productivity(TFP) of different provinces in China.First evaluation result shows that the elasticity of TFP to the domestic R&D stock is between 0.34 and 0.47.This finding implies that domestic R&D investment is the major source of technological improvement in China.Second evaluation result shows that the elasticity of TFP to the direct foreign R&D stock is 0.06.This finding implies that direct foreign R&D spillovers have significant impact on TFP.However,its impact on TFP is weaker than that of domestic R&D investment.Third evaluation result shows that the domestic and direct foreign R&D stocks are complementary for TFP growth. The previous research primarily analyzes the effect of technology spillovers on OLS method.These studies have the major limitation that the impact of independent variables(IVs) on conditional dependent variable(DV) at different locations is assumed to be constant.According to the assumption,the mean estimate of OLS cannot reflect the differential impact of IVs on the conditional DV at difference locations. Is the impact of direct foreign R&D spillovers on the TFP in thirty provinces constant even though so much provinces heterogeneity exists? The quantile regression helps to answer this question.The results show that when TTP's quantile increases,the elasticity of TFP to direct foreign R&D stocks decreases dramatically from 0.14 and 0.02.This indicates that the contribution of direct foreign R&D spillovers to the TFP decreases while the TFP rises.There are two possible reasons for this negative correlation.First,imitative innovation is more difficult in provinces with higher TFP than in those with lower TFP. Second,direct international R&D spillovers have some limitations.Different from technology imports and patents purchases,direct technology spillovers is not effective for developing countries,such as China,to acquire critical technologies.This finding indicates that non-critical and general technological knowledge obtained through direct technology spillovers has higher effect on the growth of TFP in provinces with lower TFP than that in provinces with higher TFP.

The regional pervasiveness of local productivity shocks on macroeconomic output in Europe

Does Technological Progress Magnify Regional Disparities?

What drives total factor productivity growth? An examination of spillover effects

Regional economic development in Europe: the role of total factor productivity

Total-Factor Spillovers, Similarities, and Competitions in the Petroleum Industry

Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact?

Technological Spillovers in Space and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China’s Electric Apparatus Industry

Productivity spillovers among linked sectors

The productivity impact of R&D and FDI spillovers: characterising regional path development

Spatial Spillovers of Regional Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Provinces

Propagation and Amplification of Local Productivity Spillovers

Regional fiscal spillovers: The role of trade linkages

Spatial Spillovers of FDI:An Empirical Study of Their Impacts on Firm Productivity in Chinese Regions

Employment imbalances in EU regions: technological dependence or high-tech trade centrality?

Direct International R&D Spillover and Total Factor Productivity in China: Empirical Research Based on Quantile Regression

Marketisation as a channel of international technology diffusion and green total factor productivity: research on the spillover effect from China’s first-tier cities

The role of localised, recombinant and anticipated technological change in European regions

Quantifying spillovers among regions

EU Economic Modelling System

Strengths and weaknesses of EU regional reactivity to shocks

Cross-national knowledge transfer, absorptive capacity, and total factor productivity: the intermediary effect test of international technology spillover