Nitrification and Yield for Delayed‐Flood Rice as Affected by a Nitrification Inhibitor and Coated Urea

P. W. Fitts,T. W. Walker,L. J. Krutz,B. R. Golden,J. J. Varco,J. Gore,J. L. Corbin,N. A. Slaton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0586

IF: 2.65

2014-09-01

Agronomy Journal

Abstract:Laboratory experiments were conducted in 2010, 2011, and 2012 in Stoneville, MS, utilizing urea fertilizer to quantify the nitrification potential of southern soils, and to evaluate a nitrification inhibitor aimed to reduce nitrification rates on clay soils. Field research was conducted from 2011 to 2013 evaluating the effectiveness of dicyandiamide (DCD) and sulfur‐polymer coated urea at reducing N loss compared to urea alone on clay soil. The number of days when half the total recovered inorganic N was in the NH 4 + –N form (half‐life for ammonium) for each soil and stabilizer for the nitrification potential and N stabilizer experiments was determined. Nitrogen was applied to the soil at 0.115 g kg −1 for both laboratory experiments while DCD was applied at three different rates for the N stabilizer experiment. These studies confirmed that the Sharkey clay soil (very‐fine, smectitic, thermic Chromic Epiaquerts) at Stoneville, MS, had significantly higher nitrification potential compared to three other soil types studied and DCD increased half‐life for ammonium by approximately threefold when compared to non‐amended urea. Field experiment data indicated that increasing DCD rate to 17 kg ha −1 increased rice ( Oryza sativa L.) grain yield response and resulted in yields comparable to the standard treatment, which was urea applied 1 day before flood establishment (dbf). The sulfur‐polymer coated urea applied 12 dbf reduced nitrification; however, it yielded less than the standard treatment. Products that limit nitrification and subsequent denitrification can optimize N efficiency, resulting in greater potential for increased yields and decreased production costs.

agronomy