Abstract:Increasingly, studies compare risk and protective factors for involvement in violent and nonviolent terrorist behaviors. This exploratory study investigates whether this distinction is sufficient, or whether it should be disaggregated further into more granular terrorist roles and behaviors. Using data on 404 referrals to a UK countering violent extremism Prevent hub specializing in mental health and associated needs, we compare violent and nonviolent referrals, and then more specific behaviors (vulnerability, proactive extremism, foreign fighting, and violence planning). Bivariate and multivariate analyses show there is value in disaggregating beyond the binary violence versus nonviolence distinction, as more (and more detailed) relationships emerged when using the disaggregated set of behaviors. While gender did not differentiate violent and nonviolent referrals, women were more likely to be referred for radicalization vulnerability or potential foreign fighting. Extreme right‐wing and extreme Islamist referrals were no more or less violent overall, but Islamist referrals were disproportionately referred for both the most and least violent behaviors. Personality and developmental disorders were associated with violence, and disaggregated behaviors provided detailed insight into the drivers of these associations. These exploratory findings, while interesting, likely do not generalize beyond our specific sample. Instead, this study's value lies in demonstrating the utility for both research and, eventually, practice of disaggregating beyond violence and nonviolence. The results demonstrate clear operational implications for threat assessment in the need to include a more refined set of risk factors to aid in assessing risk of more relevant outcomes than terrorist involvement overall.

Social Exclusion and Political Violence: Multilevel Analysis of the Justification of Terrorism

Psychology of Transnational Terrorism and Extreme Political Conflict.

POSSIBLE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND SECURITY-POLITICAL CAUSES OF TERRORISM: VIEW OF EXPERTS FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Understanding Terrorist Organizations with a Dynamic Model

Provoking Local Ethnic Violence – A Global Study on Ethnic Polarization and Terrorist Targeting

Provoking Ordinary People: the Effects of Terrorism on Civilian Violence

A Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Violent Extremist Propaganda: The Motivational Pathways Underlying Movement Toward and Away From Violent Extremist Action

Pathway to terrorist behaviors: The role of childhood experiences, personality traits, and ideological motivations in a sample of Iraqi prisoners

Terrorism as Coalitional Predation: Explaining Definitional Ambiguities and Precautionary Responses

Fifty Shades of Terrorist Credit-Taking: A Review of the Existing Scholarship on Terrorist Credit-Taking

Terrorist violence and the fuzzy frontier: national and supranational identities in Britain

A Bayesian Approach to Modelling Fine-Scale Spatial Dynamics of Non-State Terrorism: World Study, 2002-2013

The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism

The Symmetries and Redundancies of Terror: Patterns in the Dark, A study of Terrorist Network Strategy and Structure

Beyond binary: Analyzing closed‐source data to compare specific roles and behaviors within violent and nonviolent terrorist involvement

Terrorism and Immigration Policy Preferences

A Time-Series Analysis of Terrorism: Intervention, Displacement, and Diffusion of Benefits

Gender Inequality and State Security: The Effects of Women’s Social Equality on Domestic Terrorism

Distinct patterns of incidental exposure to and active selection of radicalizing information indicate varying levels of support for violent extremism

A Bayesian Approach to Modelling Subnational Spatial Dynamics of Worldwide Non-State Terrorism, 2010–2016

Discrimination against suspected Islamic terrorists: Nationality, right‐wing authoritarianism, and perceived threat as predictors of support for torture