Abstract:Destructive leadership, a prevalent negative behavior in modern organizations, continues to captivate the interest of scholars and professionals due to its detrimental aftermath. Drawing from social psychological (culture) and conservation of resources theory, we explore the moderating impact of psychological power distance on the link between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion. The main contribution of this study is that it has created new information about the moderating role of some specific sub-dimensions of psychological power distance (e.g., hierarchy, prestige) in the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion. Our findings also reveal a positive correlation between a destructive leadership style and emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, the prestige aspect of psychological power distance amplifies the influence of deficient leadership abilities and unethical conduct on emotional exhaustion. Notably, our study highlights that in the Turkish context, characterized by high power distance, and escalating hierarchies the impact of nepotism disparities on emotional exhaustion. In conclusion, these novel insights underscore a significant research avenue regarding cultural facets.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to explore the moderating role of Psychological Power Distance (PPD) in the relationship between Destructive Leadership (DL) and Emotional Exhaustion (EE). Specifically, the study focuses on the following issues:
1. **The relationship between Destructive Leadership and Emotional Exhaustion**:
- The study hypothesizes that destructive leadership behavior will increase employees' levels of emotional exhaustion.
- Hypothesis 1 (H1): There is a positive relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.
2. **The moderating role of Psychological Power Distance**:
- The study further hypothesizes that psychological power distance moderates the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.
- Hypothesis 2 (H2): Psychological power distance moderates the relationship between perceived destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.
### Background and Theoretical Foundation
- **Destructive Leadership**:
- Defined as systematic and repeated behaviors by leaders or managers that harm the legitimate interests of the organization, weaken organizational resources, efficiency, subordinates' motivation, and job satisfaction.
- Destructive leadership behaviors can be divided into active and passive forms, including injustice, intimidation, lack of decisiveness, etc.
- **Emotional Exhaustion**:
- Refers to a state of physical and mental fatigue caused by prolonged interpersonal stress situations, and is an important dimension of job burnout.
- Emotional exhaustion can lead to anxiety, stress, depression, and other negative emotions in employees, affecting their job performance and organizational health.
- **Psychological Power Distance**:
- Refers to individuals' perceptions, cognitions, and attitudes towards power differences in the workplace.
- Individuals with high psychological power distance are more inclined to accept and tolerate power differences, avoid conflicts with authority figures, pursue status and prestige, and expect social distance between managers and employees.
### Research Methods
- **Sample and Data Collection**:
- Data were collected from 222 employees in various industries in Turkey using a convenience sampling method.
- Data collection was conducted through an online survey questionnaire, with participants participating voluntarily.
- **Statistical Analysis**:
- Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 27 and AMOS 24.
- Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, and moderation effect analysis were conducted.
### Main Findings
- **Verification of Hypothesis 1**:
- The study results support Hypothesis 1, indicating a positive relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.
- Specifically, authoritarian leadership style significantly positively affects emotional exhaustion.
- **Verification of Hypothesis 2**:
- The study results partially support Hypothesis 2, indicating that psychological power distance moderates the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion in certain specific sub-dimensions.
- Specifically, the interaction of leadership incompetence and unethical behavior with prestige, the interaction of incompetence in handling new technologies and other changes with hierarchy, the interaction of incompetence in handling new technologies and other changes with prestige, and the interaction of nepotism with hierarchy all significantly positively affect emotional exhaustion.
### Conclusion
This study reveals the moderating role of psychological power distance in the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion, particularly in high power distance cultural contexts such as Turkey. These findings contribute to understanding the impact of leadership behavior on employees' psychological health in different cultural contexts and provide valuable references for organizational management.