Abstract:RationaleAlthough increasingly subject to criticism, the brain disease model of addiction (BDMA) remains dominant within addiction science. Yet few advocates or critics of the BDMA have provided an account of what a brain disease is. The aim of this review is to conceptually clarify what it would mean for the BDMA to be true, rather than to argue decisively for or against it.ObjectivesConceptual clarification of the BDMA requires consideration of possible models of disease and their relationship to the BDMA. A barrier to such consideration is belief that the BDMA is necessary to combatting addiction stigma. To address this barrier, I begin with discussion of what we know about the effects of the brain disease label on addiction stigma, and why labelling effects should have no bearing on the validity of the BDMA. I then distinguish strong, minimal, network, and mismatch models of disease, and I argue that the BDMA aligns with a strong disease model. This means that underlying brain pathology is hypothesized to be the cause of the personal-level observable signs and experienced symptoms characteristic of addiction. Evaluation of the BDMA therefore requires analysis of the concepts of brain dysfunction and causation, and their application to addiction science.ResultsBrain dysfunction cannot be analyzed merely as brain changes or brain differences; nor can it be inferred merely from the presence of personal-level signs and symptoms. It is necessary to have an account of normal brain function by which to measure it. The theoretical and empirical challenges to developing such an account are not insurmountable, but they are substantial. Although there exist competing analyses of causation, there is a relatively standard method used to establish it within experimental science: intervention. Using this method, the causal significance of brain states, such as, e.g., extensive gray matter loss and/or neuroadapations in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system, is not yet fully demonstrated. Further studies are necessary to determine their effect compared with other possible variables, such as, e.g., alternative reinforcers.ConclusionsConceptual clarification and preliminary empirical assessment of the BDMA recommends agnosticism about its validity and an openness to heterogeneity; in some cases addiction may be a brain disease, in others not. Either way, addiction stigma can be combatted by fighting moralism about drugs and moralistic drug policies directly, as opposed to resting hopes on the brain disease label.

Can 'justified disapproval' be separated from addiction stigma? An empirical focus is required

Stigmata that are desired: contradictions in addiction

Motivated reasoning and scientific racism in compulsion theory of human addiction: Methodological framework to promote social justice

Stigma and Self-Stigma in Addiction

Examining the relationship between public stigma, models of addiction, and addictive disorders

Stigma Toward Substance Dependence: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Interventions

Stigma: how it affects the substance use disorder patient

Q: Is Addiction a Brain Disease or a Moral Failing? A: Neither

Making sense of drug use and dependence-A scoping review of mass media interventions intended to reduce stigma towards people who use drugs

Solutions to Reduce the Social Harms of Stigma

Public Stigma Across Addictive Behaviors: Casino Gambling, eSports Gambling, and Internet Gaming

A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study

Is addiction a brain disease? A plea for agnosticism and heterogeneity

Fear of Stigma Mediates the Relationship between Internalized Stigma and Treatment-Seeking among Individuals with Substance Use Problems

A qualitative examination of addiction disclosure and stigma among recovering adolescents

Opioid Use Disorder Stigma Reduction Through Story Telling Narrative and Sharing: a Qualitative Review and Lessons Learned

Gambling harms, stigmatisation and discrimination: A qualitative naturalistic forum analysis

Addiction is driven by excessive goal-directed drug choice under negative affect: translational critique of habit and compulsion theory

How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours?

"I am not a junkie": Social categorization and differentiation among people who use drugs

Persistence of stigma and the cessation of substance use: comparing stigma domains between those who currently use and those who no longer use substances