Abstract:In recent years, new protein engineering methods have produced more than a dozen symmetric, self‐assembling protein cages whose structures have been validated to match their design models with near‐atomic accuracy. However, many protein cage designs that are tested in the lab do not form the desired assembly, and improving the success rate of design has been a point of recent emphasis. Here we present two protein structures solved by X‐ray crystallography of designed protein oligomers that form two‐component cages with tetrahedral symmetry. To improve on the past tendency towards poorly soluble protein, we used a computational protocol that favors the formation of hydrogen bonding networks over exclusively hydrophobic interactions to stabilize the designed protein‐protein interfaces. Preliminary characterization showed highly soluble expression, and solution studies indicated successful cage formation by both designed proteins. For one of the designs, a crystal structure confirmed at high resolution that the intended tetrahedral cage was formed, though several flipped amino acid side chain rotamers resulted in an interface that deviates from the precise hydrogen bonding pattern that was intended. A structure of the other designed cage showed that under the conditions where crystals were obtained, a non‐cage structure was formed wherein a porous 3D protein network in space group I213 is generated by an off‐target 2‐fold homomeric interface. These results illustrate some of the ongoing challenges of developing computational methods for polar interface design, and add two potentially valuable new entries to the growing list of engineered protein materials for downstream applications.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Guidelines for the successful generation of protein–ligand complex crystals

Revealing protein structures: crystallization of protein‐ligand complexes – co‐crystallization and crystal soaking

Optimizing Protein Crystal Growth Through Dynamic Seeding

Computational Crystallization

Optimization and Control of Crystal Shape and Size in Protein Crystallization Process

Supramolecular gels: a versatile crystallization toolbox

Accurate computational design of three-dimensional protein crystals

Large-scale crystallization of proteins for purification and formulation

Surface-mutagenesis strategies to enable structural biology crystallization platforms

A streamlined approach to structure elucidation using in cellulo crystallized recombinant proteins, InCellCryst

Smart Materials for Increasing the Success of Protein Crystallization

Soft Matter Perspective on Protein Crystal Assembly

Protein Fusion Strategies for Membrane Protein Stabilization and Crystal Structure Determination

Protein Crystallization with a Combination of Hard and Soft Precipitants.

Competition between monomeric and dimeric crystals in schematic models for globular proteins

Molecular Modeling Applications in Crystallization

Statistical analysis of crystallization database links protein physico-chemical features with crystallization mechanisms

Competition Between Supramolecular Interaction and Protein–Protein Interaction in Protein Crystallization: Effects of Crystallization Method and Small Molecular Bridge

Design and structure of two new protein cages illustrate successes and ongoing challenges in protein engineering

Crystallizing protein assemblies via free and grafted linkers

Crystal structures of fusion proteins with large‐affinity tags