Abstract:Controlled environment agriculture (CEA) is critical for achieving year-round food security in many regions of the world. CEA is a resource-intensive endeavor, with lighting consuming a large fraction of the energy. To lessen the burden on the grid and save costs, an extended photoperiod strategy can take advantage of off-peak time-of-day options from utility suppliers. However, extending the photoperiod limits crop production morphologically and physiologically if pushed too long. Here, we present a continuous-light dynamic light-emitting diode (LED) strategy (involving changes in spectra, intensity, and timing), that overcomes these limitations. We focused on tomato, a well described photoperiodic injury–sensitive species, and mini-cucumber, a photoperiodic injury-tolerant species to first assess morphological responses under control (16-h photoperiod, unchanging spectrum), constant (24-h photoperiod, unchanging spectrum), and two variations of a dynamic LED strategy, dynamic 1 (16-h "day", 3-h "peak", 8-h "night" spectra) and dynamic 2 (20-h "day", 5-h "peak", 4-h "night" spectra). Next, we tested the hypothesis of photorespiration's involvement in photoperiodic injury by using a leaf gas exchange coupled with chlorophyll fluorescence protocol. We further explored Adenosine triphosphate (ATP): Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) ratio supply/demand responses by probing photosynthetic electron flow and proton flow with the MultispeQ instrument. We found canopy architecture can be tuned by minor variations of the same dynamic LED strategy, and we highlight dynamic 1 as the optimal choice for both tomato and mini-cucumber as it improved biomass/architecture and first-yield, respectively. A central discovery was that dynamic 1 had a significantly higher level of photorespiration than control, for both species. Unexpectedly, photorespiration was comparable between species under the same treatments, except under constant. However, preliminary data on a fully tolerant tomato genotype grown under constant treatment upregulated photorespiration similar to mini-cucumber. These results suggest that photoperiodic injury tolerance involves a sustained higher level of photorespiration under extended photoperiods. Interestingly, diurnal MultispeQ measurements point to the importance of cyclic electron flow at subjective nighttime that may also partially explain why dynamic LED strategies mitigate photoperiodic injury. We propose an ontology of photoperiodic injury involving photorespiration, triose phosphate utilization, peroxisomal H 2 O 2 -catalase balance, and a circadian external coincidence model of sensitivity that initiates programmed cell death.

Photosynthesis and photoprotection in top leaves respond faster to irradiance fluctuations than bottom leaves in a tomato canopy

Chloroplast ATP synthase restricts photosynthesis under fluctuating light in tomato but not in maize

Natural genetic variation in dynamic photosynthesis is correlated with stomatal anatomical traits in diverse tomato species across geographical habitats

The response of photosystem I to fluctuating light is influenced by leaf nitrogen content in tomato

Photoinhibition and photosynthetic regulation in fluctuating light under compound stresses of drought and heat

Photosynthetic Induction Under Fluctuating Light Is Affected by Leaf Nitrogen Content in Tomato

Caught between two states: The compromise in acclimation of photosynthesis, transpiration and mesophyll conductance to different amplitudes of fluctuating irradiance

Light-induced HY5 Functions As a Systemic Signal to Coordinate the Photoprotective Response to Light Fluctuation.

Response of photosynthetic efficiency to short-term fluctuating light and cold in tomato

Differential Impact of Decreasing Relative Humidity on Photosynthesis under Fluctuating Light Between Maize and Tomato

Fluctuating light induces a significant photoinhibition of photosystem I in maize

Diurnal Response of Photosystem I to Fluctuating Light Is Affected by Stomatal Conductance

Variation of Photosynthetic Induction in Major Horticultural Crops Is Mostly Driven by Differences in Stomatal Traits

Polychromatic Supplemental Lighting from Underneath Canopy is More Effective to Enhance Tomato Plant Development by Improving Leaf Photosynthesis and Stomatal Regulation

Variation in leaf photosynthetic capacity within plant canopies: optimization, structural, and physiological constraints and inefficiencies

Tomato and mini-cucumber tolerance to photoperiodic injury involves photorespiration and the engagement of nighttime cyclic electron flow from dynamic LEDs

Mesophyll conductance limits photosynthesis in fluctuating light under combined drought and heat stresses

Photosynthetic induction and its diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes as affected by CO2 partial pressure, temperature, air humidity and blue irradiance

Responses of Tomato Leaf Photosynthesis to Rapid Water Stress

Elevated CO 2 Improves Photosynthesis Under High Temperature by Attenuating the Functional Limitations to Energy Fluxes, Electron Transport and Redox Homeostasis in Tomato Leaves.

Detached leaves of tomato differ in their photosynthetic physiological response to moderate high and low temperature stress