Rapid quantification of prostate specific antigen (PSA) from fingerstick (FS) blood.

Joseph Earl Thomas,Balaji Srinivasan,Nicole Jacobs,Alfred Winkler,Zhen Zhao,Erica Phillips,Kevin Kensler,Scott T. Tagawa,Jones T. Nauseef,Ana M. Molina,Cora N. Sternberg,Michael Philip Sun,Douglas Scherr,Christopher Barbieri,Jim Hu,Timothy D McClure,Jon Reckler,David Erickson,Saurabh Mehta,David M. Nanus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.279
IF: 45.3
2024-02-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:279 Background: Screening for prostate cancer (PC) reduces PC-specific deaths. African American (AA) individuals have a ~2-fold higher risk of developing and dying from PC and may benefit from screening at a younger age. To increase access to PC screening for high-risk communities, we developed a portable, rapid point of care (POC) PSA test that quantifies PSA from FS blood in 20 minutes. We present preliminary data for our POC test. Methods: We developed a lateral flow immunoassay test strip 1 combined with the Cube Reader (Chembio Diagnostics GmbH) to quantify PSA from FS blood. These measurements were compared on the same day with standard venous blood PSA as measured with the Siemens Centaur Chemiluminescent Immunoassay. Following informed consent, 50 μL of FS blood was mixed with 80 μL of buffer (PBS 1X with 1% Tween-20) and loaded onto the test strip. This ratio was found to be effective for adequate sample flow on the test strip. Eligible patients (pts) were undergoing standard of care PSA testing and had a recent PSA 4 ng/mL was 100% (95% CI: 71.51-100) and 90% (95% CI: 55.50-99.75), respectively, in the 0.3-10 ng/mL detection range. Nineteen percent (8/42) of pts were AA. Conclusions: Serum from capillary and venous blood shows a strong correlation when measured via a standard laboratory assay. In addition, a rapid POC PSA test using a PSA test strip is easy to administer and preliminary data suggest a good correlation with standard venous PSA testing. The development of such a test may improve access to PC screening for high-risk individuals. Continued optimization and validation of our POC test is ongoing. 1. Curr Res Biotechnol 2021;3:288-299. Clinical trial information: N/A.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?