Abstract:Because of quantitative revolution, geography evolved from a discipline of spatial description into a science of distributions. Accordingly, qualitative methods were replaced by the integrated methods of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis. One of the important approaches to spatial analysis is to characterize geographical distributions. Geographical distributions fall into spatial distributions and size distributions, both of which can be divided into simple distributions and complex distributions. A simple distribution has a characteristic scale(represented by a characteristic length), while a complex distribution has no characteristic scale but bears a property of scaling invariance(represented by a scaling exponent). The key step of studying a simple distribution is to find its characteristic scale, while the basic way of research for a complex distribution is to make a scaling analysis. For simple distributions, traditional methods based on advanced mathematics are effective, but for complex distributions, the old- fashioned mathematical tools are ineffective.However, due to the lack of understanding of characteristic scale and scaling, geographers often failed to distinguish between simple distributions and complex distributions. As a result, many complex systems such as cities and systems of cities were mistaken for simple systems. Consequently, geography did not succeed in theorization in the 1960s- 1970 s after quantification in the 1950s- 1960 s. Geographical distributions can be mathematically abstracted as probability distributions. For a simple distribution, its characteristic scale can be determined. A typical characteristic scale is a mean(average value). Based on means, we can compute a variance and a covariance. Thus we have a clear probability structure comprising means, variances, and covariances,which explain the pattern of the geographical system and predict its process of evolution. In the case of a complex distribution, an effective mean cannot be determined, and thus little is known about its probability structure. In this situation, characteristic scale analysis should be substituted with scaling analysis. Quantitative methods of scaling analysis have emerged from interdisciplinary studies. A new integrated theory based on concepts from fractals, allometry, and complex network has been developing for geographical modeling and analysis.

Characteristic Scales, Scaling, and Geospatial Analysis

Geographical Modeling: from Characteristic Scale to Scaling

Principles and methods of scaling geospatial Earth science data

Geographical Analysis: from Distance-based Space to Dimension-based Space

Simplicity, Complexity, and Mathematical Modeling of Geographical Distributions

Some Scaling Issues of Geography

Scaling, Fractals and the Spatial Complexity of Cities

[Spatial Variance Characters of Urban Synthesis Pattern Indices at Different Scales].

Spatial Scale Effect of Urban Land Use Landscape Pattern in Shanghai City

Scaling Geospatial Data from the Perspective of Complexity: Exploring the Scaling Behavior of the Entropogram

Quantifying the Scale Effect in Geospatial Big Data Using Semi-Variograms.

Scaling Invariance of Spatial Autocorrelation in Urban Landscape

Scaling of Geographic Space from the Perspective of City and Field Blocks and Using Volunteered Geographic Information

Geographical space based on urban allometry and fractal dimension

Spatial Units Of Land Use Potential Evaluation On Regional Scales

Paradoxical Interpretations of Urban Scaling Laws

Geospatial Analysis Requires a Different Way of Thinking: The Problem of Spatial Heterogeneity

AN REVIEW ON SCALE IN REMOTE SENSING

Scaling invariance of spatial autocorrelation in urban built-up area

A Topological Approach to Scaling in Financial Data

Multivariable-based correlation dimension analysis for generalized space