Predicting thresholds for population replacement gene drives

Anna Janzen,Ratnasri Pothula,Adam Sychla,Nathan R. Feltman,Michael J. Smanski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01823-2
IF: 7.364
2024-02-21
BMC Biology
Abstract:Threshold-dependent gene drives (TDGDs) could be used to spread desirable traits through a population, and are likely to be less invasive and easier to control than threshold-independent gene drives. Engineered Genetic Incompatibility (EGI) is an extreme underdominance system previously demonstrated in Drosophila melanogaster that can function as a TDGD when EGI agents of both sexes are released into a wild-type population.
biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to determine the relative fitness of two differently - designed Engineered Genetic Incompatibility (EGI) gene - drive systems and their threshold frequencies in population replacement. Specifically, the researchers compared the differences in fertility, mating preference, and temperature - dependent relative fitness between EGI genotypes and wild - type Drosophila melanogaster through a single - generation fitness experiment. In addition, the study also explored the performance of these EGI genotypes at different temperatures to evaluate the impact of environmental factors on the gene - drive threshold. ### Research Background Gene - drive technology can direct an allele to spread in a population, even if the fitness cost carried by this allele would usually cause it to be eliminated by natural selection. Engineered gene - drives can be used to change the characteristics of existing populations, for example, to spread anti - disease genes in vector populations. Another design is to suppress populations by spreading alleles that reduce fitness or fertility. However, Threshold - Dependent Gene Drives (TDGDs) need to reach a certain threshold frequency in the population before they can spread to fixation, so they are less invasive and easier to control and reverse, making them a more ideal alternative. ### Research Methods The researchers used a single - generation fitness experiment to measure the fertility and mating preference of two EGI genotypes (N17.1 and A3.7), and estimated the threshold frequency of population replacement through a mixed - population experiment. The experimental design included: - **Fertility Test**: By setting up 20 male and 20 female homozygous EGI or wild - type Drosophila, record the number of offspring produced in each vial. - **Mating Preference Test**: Through the four - fly test (with one wild - type male fly, one EGI male fly, one wild - type female fly, and one EGI female fly in each vial), record the combination of the first mating to evaluate mating preference. - **Temperature Impact Test**: Repeat the above experiments at different temperatures to evaluate the impact of temperature on the EGI genotype threshold. ### Main Findings - **Fertility Differences**: The fertility of N17.1 was significantly lower than that of the wild - type, while the fertility of A3.7 was significantly higher than that of the wild - type. - **Mating Preference**: Both EGI genotypes exhibited non - random mating behavior, but N17.1 showed a slight assortative mating preference. - **Temperature Impact**: The threshold frequency of A3.7 varied greatly at different temperatures, while the threshold frequency of N17.1 was less affected by temperature. ### Conclusion This study provides a rapid method for estimating the threshold of TDGD strategies through a single - generation fitness experiment, especially for cases where heterozygotes are not viable. At the same time, the study emphasizes the importance of empirical characterization of multiple engineered strains, because different genotypes may exhibit behavioral differences for unknown reasons. This provides important reference data for the future application of gene - drive technology.