Abstract:Purpose: To compare postoperative clinical outcomes at the 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and latest follow-up in patients undergoing supervised physical therapy (PT) or a home-based exercise program after arthroscopic repair (ARCR) of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent either supervised PT or home-based therapy after ARCR of MRCTs between January 2015 and December 2018 at a single center with a minimum 24-month follow-up. At their 2-week postoperative routine follow-up, patients were allowed to choose between home-based and supervised PT. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) were collected and compared between cohorts preoperatively and at the 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and latest follow-up. The percentage of patients reaching or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient accepted symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and Subjective Shoulder Value was recorded for both cohorts at each time point. Complications, healing, satisfaction, and return to work were reported. Healing was evaluated via ultrasound at the latest follow-up. Results: Ninety-nine patients met the study criteria: 61 in the supervised PT cohort and 38 in the home-based cohort. The supervised PT and home-based cohorts returned to the clinic for their most recent follow-up at 53 ± 20 and 55 ± 16 months (P = .496) after surgery, respectively. There was no difference when comparing tendon involvement (supraspinatus, P = .574; infraspinatus, P = .288; subscapularis, P = .592), tear retraction (P = .603), or high-grade fatty infiltration (supraspinatus, P = .684; infraspinatus, P = .397; subscapularis, P = .473) based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment and surgery-related factors, including anterior (P = .473) or posterior (P = .386) slides, fixation constructs (P = .829), or complete repair (P = .912). Both cohorts showed similar PROs and ROM at baseline. Postoperative PROs and ROM were similar among groups at the 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and latest follow-up. However, ASES (71.4 vs 61.2; P = .013) and forward flexion (135° vs 118°; P = .023) were significantly higher at 3-month follow-up in the home-based cohort. Both groups comparably achieved MCID and PASS for PROs at the 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. At the latest follow-up, the supervised PT and home-based cohort achieved MCID and PASS for visual analog scale (75% vs 81%, P = .573; 70% vs 72%, P = .911), ASES (76% vs 74%, P = .777; 72% vs 72%, P = .873), and Subjective Shoulder Value (82% vs 84%, P = .734; 72% vs 66%, P = .489), respectively. Satisfaction, healing, complication, and return-to-work rates were similar. Conclusions: Patients undergoing rehabilitation using a home-based protocol showed largely similar functional scores and healing to those with supervised PT after ARCR of MRCTs at the latest follow-up. Although patients with home-based therapy achieved higher forward flexion and ASES at the 3-month follow-up, these became comparable starting at the 6-month postoperative mark. MCID and PASS were achieved similarly for PROs at each time point. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective case series comparison.

Combination of Superior and Posterior Capsular Release Versus Superior Capsular Release Alone in Arthroscopic Repair of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Subjective and Objective Outcome after Revision Arthroscopic Stabilization for Recurrent Anterior Instability Versus Initial Shoulder Stabilization

A Comparative Study on Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft With and Without Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Augmentation: Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Combined With Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer Improves the Biomechanics in Posterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Primary Rotator Cuff Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Technique for Repairing Rotator Cuff Tears: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Middle Trapezius Tendon Transfer for Isolated Irreparable Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: Static Versus Dynamic Reconstruction

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review of Modern Literature

A Comparative Study of Superior Capsule Reconstruction and Patch Graft Augmentation

Margin convergence versus superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes are equivalent unless there is pre-operative pseudoparesis

Biomechanical Comparison Between Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer in Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

Poster 154: Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Side-to-Side Sutures for Full-Thickness Transtendinous Supraspinatus Tears Yields Excellent Outcomes and Low Retear Rates Similar to Traditional Tendon-to-Bone Fixation at Mean Follow Up of 4 Years

Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Repair With Suture-First Versus Anchor-First Technique in Patients With Posterior Shoulder Instability (Type B2): Clinical Midterm Follow-up

Rotator Cuff Repair Improves Clinical Function and Stability in Patients Older Than 50 Years with Anterior Shoulder Dislocations and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 65 Years and Older With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear

Muscle Advancement During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as a Treatment Option for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Home-Based or Supervised Physical Therapy Shows Similar Functional Outcomes and Healing After Massive Rotator Cuff Repair

Clinical Outcome of an All Arthroscopic 'Whole Layer' Rotator Cuff Repair Technique with Simultaneous Biceps Tenodesis

Clinical outcome of arthroscopic acromioplasty vs. arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A3-year follow-up

Single-row, double-row, and transosseous equivalent techniques for isolated supraspinatus tendon tears with minimal atrophy: A retrospective comparative outcome and radiographic analysis at minimum 2-year followup