P241. Comparison of age differences in clinical outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy
John Sencaj,Gregory Snigur,Andrea M. Roca,Fatima Anwar,Alexandra C. Loya,Srinath Medakkar,Arash Sayari,Kern Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.364
IF: 4.297
2024-08-20
The Spine Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT In the United States, one of the more commonly performed elective spine surgical procedures is lumbar discectomy for treatment of disc herniation in patients experiencing back or leg pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatment. The general age of the US population is rising with an expected increase in the frequency of surgical interventions for age-related spine conditions Studies have shown that older patients demonstrate recurrence of herniations earlier while younger patients have lower rates of reoperation for herniations. PURPOSE This purpose of this study is to understand the impact of age on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy to better manage patient selection for physicians and expectations regarding post-surgical recovery for patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE A single spine surgeon's records were searched to identify patients who underwent primary lumbar discectomy. Eligible patients did not undergo treatment for malignancy, trauma, or infection, and had recorded PROMs. In total, 1,144 patients were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures included minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and perioperative traits such as herniated disc diagnosis, spinal pathologies, number of discectomy levels, operative time, blood loss volume, postoperative stay duration, pain, and narcotic use. Collected PROMs were Visual Analog Scale-back and leg pain (VAS-Back, VAS-L), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and physical function scores including PROMIS-Physical Function, Veteran Rands 12-Item Form Physical Composite Score (VR-12 PCS) and Short Form 12-Item Physical Function domain (SF-12 PCS). METHODS Included patients underwent surgery from December 2005 to April 2023. Patients were divided by age into four categories: Age I (25-35 years), Age II (35-45), Age III (45-55), and Age IV (+55). Demographic and perioperative data were extracted and compared using chi-square tests (categorical variables) or independent samples t-test (continuous variables). PROMs were compared using chi-squared and ANOVA analysis. Post-hoc testing was conducted using Tukey tests. RESULTS Preoperatively, no significant intercohort differences existed. At the 6-week follow-up, intercohort VAS-Back scores (p=0.048) and SF-12 PCS scores (p=0.030) were different, and by the final follow-up, a significant difference was seen in PROMIS-PF scores (p=0.028). Significant differences in MCID achievement rates occurred in VR-12 PCS (p=0.026), SF-12 PCS (p=0.002), PROMIS-PF (p<0.001), and VAS-Back (p<0.001), with Age I exhibiting overall higher MCID achievement rates. Post-hoc Tukey test revealed significant MCID achievement rates for VAS-B were between Age II and Age III (p=0.40), and significant for PROMIS-PF between Age I and Age III (p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS Our study underscores the role of age in determining the outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy, a procedure likely to increase in frequency in the coming decades. Notably, our research ventured beyond the traditional elderly-versus-younger categorizations common in previous studies by highlighting significant variations in PROMs and MCID achievement rates across more finely-stratified age groups. PROMs distinctions emerged at 6-week and final postoperative follow-ups for back pain and physical function. The 25-35 age group demonstrated higher MCID achievement rates. This nuanced approach reveals that age-related influences on recovery extend beyond just the elderly population, presenting information to better guide patient selection and counseling in the realm of spine surgery. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
clinical neurology,orthopedics