Abstract:There is a growing body of evidence showing that humans make automatic and reliable personality inferences from facial appearance. Interestingly, it has been robustly shown that the recognition of other-race faces is impaired compared to same-race faces (the so-called other-race effect), with categorization of gender and age also achieved inefficiently. However, the extent to which the ability of making reliable inferences from faces generalizes across cultures and faces from different races is poorly understood. This issue is even timelier considering recent studies that have challenged the universality of face processing. For instance, we recently showed that Westerners predominantly fixate the eyes during face recognition, whereas Easterners fixate the central region of the face (i.e., nose) (Blais et al., 2008). Culture also modulates the strategy observers use to gather visual information during facial expression categorization (Jack et al., 2009). Therefore, asking whether social judgments from faces generalize across cultures is a natural question to be addressed. To this aim, we tested Western Caucasian and East Asian observers performing visual and social judgments from all the combinations of face pairs sampled from 40 Western Caucasian and 40 East Asian unfamiliar faces. Observers from both cultures first evaluated the physical and the social similarity of each face pair. Subsequently, observers performed binary social evaluations on the same face pairs for attractiveness, competence, trustworthiness and warmth. All binary decisions were paired with a measure of confidence. Finally, we represented the face space for each of the judgments in matrices of dissimilarity weighted by confidence levels for each observer and culture. Mantel correlations performed on the matrices of dissimilarity indicated a fairly robust agreement across cultures for all judgments, both visual and social. Our data show that humans rely on universal rules to perform trait inferences from facial appearance.

Comparison with others influences encoding and recognition of their faces: behavioural and ERP evidence

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

Taking Others as a Mirror: Contingent Social Comparison Promotes Task Engagement.

Context-based interpersonal relationship modulates social comparison between outcomes: an event-related potential study

Contextual effects of angry vocal expressions on the encoding and recognition of emotional faces: An event-related potential (ERP) study

Invisible Social Grouping Facilitates the Recognition of Individual Faces.

Cultural Influences on the Processing of Social Comparison Feedback Signals—an ERP Study

ERP Profiles for Face and Word Recognition Are Based on Their Status in Semantic Memory Not Their Stimulus Category

Self Identity in Sociocultural Contexts: Implications from Studies of Self-face Recognition

Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition.

Interpersonal brain synchronization in the right temporo-parietal junction during face-to-face economic exchange

Brain Responses in Evaluating Feedback Stimuli with a Social Dimension.

Perception and memory-based representations of facial emotions: Associations with personality functioning, affective states and recognition abilities

Extraversion Predicts Individual Differences in Face Recognition

Dissociations of Subliminal and Supraliminal Self-Face from Other-Face Processing: Behavioral and ERP Evidence

Social Conformity Updates the Neural Representation of Facial Attractiveness

The priming effects of emotional vocal expressions on face encoding and recognition: An ERP study

Internal Versus External Features in Triggering the Brain Waveforms for Conjunction and Feature Faces in Recognition

Memory of my victory and your defeat: Contributions of reward- and memory-related regions to the encoding of winning events in competitions with others

Dynamic cultural modulation of neural responses to one's own and friend's faces.

The Effects Of Image Parameters On Face Discrimination And Erps