Abstract:Introduction . Blood pressure (BP) has been a potential risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. BP measurement is one of the most useful parameters for early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. At present, BP measurement mainly relies on cuff-based techniques that cause inconvenience and discomfort to users. Although some of the present prototype cuffless BP measurement techniques are able to reach overall acceptable accuracies, they require an electrocardiogram (ECG) and a photoplethysmograph (PPG) that make them unsuitable for true wearable applications. Therefore, developing a single PPG-based cuffless BP estimation algorithm with enough accuracy would be clinically and practically useful. Methods . The University of Queensland vital sign dataset (online database) was accessed to extract raw PPG signals and its corresponding reference BPs (systolic BP and diastolic BP). The online database consisted of PPG waveforms of 32 cases from whom 8133 (good quality) signal segments (5 s for each) were extracted, preprocessed, and normalised in both width and amplitude. Three most significant pulse features (pulse area, pulse rising time, and width 25%) with their corresponding reference BPs were used to train and test three machine learning algorithms (regression tree, multiple linear regression (MLR), and support vector machine (SVM)). A 10-fold cross-validation was applied to obtain overall BP estimation accuracy, separately for the three machine learning algorithms. Their estimation accuracies were further analysed separately for three clinical BP categories (normotensive, hypertensive, and hypotensive). Finally, they were compared with the ISO standard for noninvasive BP device validation (average difference no greater than 5 mmHg and SD no greater than 8 mmHg). Results . In terms of overall estimation accuracy, the regression tree achieved the best overall accuracy for SBP (mean and SD of difference: −0.1 ± 6.5 mmHg) and DBP (mean and SD of difference: −0.6 ± 5.2 mmHg). MLR and SVM achieved the overall mean difference less than 5 mmHg for both SBP and DBP, but their SD of difference was >8 mmHg. Regarding the estimation accuracy in each BP categories, only the regression tree achieved acceptable ISO standard for SBP (−1.1 ± 5.7 mmHg) and DBP (−0.03 ± 5.6 mmHg) in the normotensive category. MLR and SVM did not achieve acceptable accuracies in any BP categories. Conclusion . This study developed and compared three machine learning algorithms to estimate BPs using PPG only and revealed that the regression tree algorithm was the best approach with overall acceptable accuracy to ISO standard for BP device validation. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the regression tree algorithm achieved acceptable measurement accuracy only in the normotensive category, suggesting that future algorithm development for BP estimation should be more specific for different BP categories.

P015 MULTICENTER, PROSPECTIVE, SINGLE-BLIND(SUBJECTS), NON-INFERIORITY VERIFICATION, CONFIRMATORY CLINICAL TRIAL FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF BLOOD PRESSURE ANALYSIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE THAT PREDICTS 4-WEEK BLOOD PRESSURE BASED ON 8-WEEK HOME BLOOD PRESSURE

Applications of artificial intelligence for hypertension management

Artificial Intelligence–Derived Risk Prediction: A Novel Risk Calculator Using Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Recent developments in machine learning modeling methods for hypertension treatment

Machine Learning-Based prediction of Post-Treatment ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension

Predicting hypertension control using machine learning

Machine Learning-Based Prediction for Incident Hypertension Based on Regular Health Checkup Data: Derivation and Validation in 2 Independent Nationwide Cohorts in South Korea and Japan

Evaluating the clinical effectiveness and patient experience of an AI-based digital tool for home-based blood pressure management

Artificial Intelligence in Hypertension Management: An Ace up Your Sleeve

Automatic identification of hypertension and assessment of its secondary effects using artificial intelligence: A systematic review (2013–2023)

Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting individual responses to antihypertensive treatments

Prediction of Intradialytic Blood Pressure Variation Based on Big Data

Transforming Hypertension Diagnosis and Management in The Era of Artificial Intelligence: A 2023 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Workshop Report

Does clinical practice supported by artificial intelligence improve hypertension care management? A pilot systematic review

Abstract 15033: Development of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Individual Response to Antihypertensive Treatments

Predictive Models for Sustained, Uncontrolled Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Algorithm Development and Validation

Effect of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring via a Smartphone Hypertension Coaching Application or Tracking Application on Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension

Blood Pressure Estimation Using Photoplethysmography Only: Comparison between Different Machine Learning Approaches

Relationships Between Blood Pressure Reduction, Weight Loss, and Engagement in a Digital App-Based Hypertension Care Program: Observational Study

VALUE OF THE PROGNOSTIC MODEL FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF HYPERTENSION USING AI ALGORITHMS

Comparing ChatGPT and Bing, in response to the Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) knowledge checklist