Abstract:Characterization of Extractables and Leachables (E&Ls) is an important aspect of product quality in important fields such as pharmaceuticals, medical devices and food contact materials. The main goal of an E&L study is identification and quantification of those species which may leach from packaging materials used to contain pharmaceuticals or which may leach directly out of a medical device or food contact material and thus may result in patient exposure. It is common practice to perform relative quantitation of extractables and leachables using surrogate standards due to the large diversity of species observed and the lack of available reference standards. A key problem in obtaining accurate E&L results arises due to response factor (RF) variation. Different compounds at the same concentration give different signal intensities and thus have different RF values. Two key aspects of study quality are affected by this problem. First, the evaluation of the number of compounds which are above the toxicologically relevant threshold (analytical evaluation threshold, (AET)) can be affected (RF Problem 1: AET Underreporting). Second, quantitative accuracy is affected which can reduce the reliability of the margin of safety (MOS) calculations which serves as the basis of the toxicological evaluation (RF Problem 2: Quantitative Error). RF databases have been the main solution proposed for solving these problems but do not reduce the underlying RF variation and lack the scope required to address quantitative error for compounds not contained in the database. In the absence of other solutions, large uncertainty factors (UF) have been applied in the AET calculations to account for RF Problem 1: AET Underreporting. These UF factors have been assigned values of 4 for GCMS and up to 10 for LCMS. Large uncertainty factors have a number of unintended negative consequences including the need for large amounts of sample concentration (>10X) prior to analysis resulting in potential compound loss or degradation and increased matrix effects. To overcome these problems, this publication demonstrates a multidetector approach using an HPLC system coupled with a Quadrupole Time of Flight Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometer (QTOF-LCMS), Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD) and an Ultraviolet-Visible Detector (UV) and a dual detection Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) system using a Polyarc Reactor system with Flame Ionization Detection (FID). Herein, it is demonstrated that this combination of methods (the multidetector approach) allowed detection and accurate surrogate standard quantitation of 217 unique extractables spanning a wide range of chemical properties (Mw, logP, pKa and boiling point). The combination of optimized detector selection with appropriate standard selection was verified to provide positive detection for 94% of the compounds at the AET level and a high level of quantitative accuracy (± 20% for 85% of the compounds and ±40% for 91% of the compounds) while using only a UF of 2. Unlike the RF database approach, the multidetector approach is not limited to only those compounds contained in the database but is applicable to the majority of extractables.

Discerning Emittable from Extractable Chemicals Identified in Consumer Products by Suspect Screening GCxGC-TOFMS

Global Detection And Identification Of Components From Crude And Processed Traditional Chinese Medicine By Liquid Chromatography Connected With Hybrid Ion Trap And Time-Of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry

Comprehensive chemical characterization of indoor dust by target, suspect screening and nontarget analysis using LC-HRMS and GC-HRMS

Non-Target Screening Analysis of Hazardous Noxious Substances Using Gas Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Non-target Screening of Organic Pollutants in Sediments and Sludges Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution

Target and Suspect Screening for Organic Additives in Six Classifications of Personal Care Products Using Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Reducing relative response factor variation using a multidetector approach for extractables and leachables (E&L) analysis to mitigate the need for uncertainty factors

Non-target Scanning of Organics from Cooking Emissions Using Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (GC×GC-MS)

Investigating the chemical space coverage of multiple chromatographic and ionization methods using non-targeted analysis on surface and drinking water collected using passive sampling

Method Development for Thermal Desorption-Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (TD-GC-MS/MS) Analysis of Trace Level Fluorotelomer Alcohols Emitted from Consumer Products

Addressing New Chemicals of Emerging Concern (cecs) in an Indoor Office

Liquid Extraction for Flavor and Fragrance Analyses in Consumer Products

A Method Utilizing Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Ultraviolet and Mass Spectrometric Detection for the Analysis of Material Extracts Produced during a Controlled Extraction Study

Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring

Extended Suspect Screening Strategy to Identify Characteristic Toxicants in the Discharge of a Chemical Industrial Park Based on Toxicity to Daphnia Magna.

Non-Targeted Analysis Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Evaluation of Chemical Composition of E-Vapor Products

Detection and quantification analysis of chemical migrants in plastic food contact products

Multidimensional-constrained Suspect Screening of Hydrophobic Chemicals Using Gas Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization-Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Suspect Screening of 200 Hazardous Substances in Plastic Toys Using Ultra-High-performance Liquid Chromatography-Hybrid Quadrupole Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry.

Nontargeted Screening of Food Matrices: Development of a Chemometric Software Strategy To Identify Unknowns in Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Data