Molecular Pathway Changes Associated with Different Post-Conditioning Exercise Interventions After Experimental TBI
James P Barrett,Taryn G Aubrecht,Aidan Smith,Maria Vaida,Rebecca J Henry,Sarah J Doran,Alan I Faden,Bogdan A Stoica
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0120
2024-08-21
Abstract:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes complex, time-dependent molecular and cellular responses, which include adaptive changes that promote repair and recovery, as well as maladaptive processes such as chronic inflammation that contribute to chronic neurodegeneration and neurological dysfunction. Hormesis is a well-established biological phenomenon in which exposure to low-dose toxins or stressors results in protective responses to subsequent higher-level stressors or insults. Hormetic stimuli show a characteristic U-shaped or inverted J-shaped dose-response curve, as well as being time and exposure-frequency dependent, similar to pre-conditioning and post-conditioning actions. Voluntary exercise interventions, before or after injury, appear to follow these general hormetic principles. But the molecular alterations associated with exercise interventions or more general hormetic responses have received only limited attention. In this study, we used a well-characterized mouse TBI model to assess the effects of different post-conditioning exercise-intervention paradigms on diverse molecular pathways, including neuroinflammation regulators, and post-traumatic neurological deficits. We generated high-throughput gene expression data and associated molecular pathway analyses to assess the potential molecular mechanisms associated with time- and duration-dependent voluntary exercise intervention, as well as time after treatment. Importantly, we also used newer analytical methods to more broadly assess the impact of exercise on diverse molecular pathways. TBI caused long-term changes in multiple neuroinflammation markers and chronic cognitive dysfunction. Notably, all delayed, post-conditioning exercise interventions reduced post-traumatic neuroinflammation and/or attenuated the related cognitive changes, albeit with different pathway specificity and effects magnitude. Exercise comprehensively reversed injury-associated effects in the hippocampus across both activated inflammatory and inhibited neuronal pathways, consistent with a return toward the noninjured, homeostatic state. In contrast, the cortex showed a less consistent pattern with more limited attenuation of inflammatory pathway activation and an amplification in the injury-dependent inhibition of select noninflammatory pathways, indicating less effective and potentially detrimental responses to exercise. Exercise intervention beginning 2 weeks after injury and lasting 2 weeks was less effective than exercise continuing for 4 weeks. Exercise initiated at a more delayed timepoint of 6 weeks after injury and continuing for 4 weeks was more effective than that during the acute phase. The delayed paradigm was also more effective than exercise initiated at 10 weeks after injury and continuing for 8 weeks, consistent with hormetic responses in other models and species. Overall, our study delineates regional and interventional parameters, as well as related molecular pathway changes, associated with post-conditioning exercise treatment, which may help inform future translational interventional strategies.