Abstract:Sexual dimorphism is almost ubiquitous in animals. A common pattern observed across multiple taxa involves differences in development time (sexual bimaturism) and body size (sexual size dimorphism) between conspecific males and females. Furthermore, a strict association of dimorphism at these traits has been documented in several taxa, where the sex showing shorter development time also has a smaller body size than the other sex. Growth and development are strongly dependent on environmental conditions during individual life-cycle in ectotherms, inducing considerable phenotypic plasticity. However, how phenotypic plasticity affects the association between sexual dimorphism in development time and body size remains unclear. Here, we tracked development time, body size, and body mass throughout the ontogeny of the mosquito Aedes mariae . The larval development of this species is strictly linked to Mediterranean Sea rock-pools, whose highly variable environmental conditions over minimal time frames make this organism-environment system ideal for exploring plasticity-led eco-evolutionary processes. We found differential plasticity between males and females, dissolving the link between dimorphism in development time and body size under increasing temperature and decreasing salinity conditions. These findings contrast with the current hypotheses proposed to explain the origin of the association between sexual bimaturism and sexual size dimorphism, highlighting the condition dependence of sexual dimorphism patterns and the need to consider phenotypic plasticity in future studies on their evolution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve
This paper aims to explore the impact of environmental condition changes on sexual dimorphism patterns, especially the association between development time and body size. Specifically, by studying the mosquito species Aedes mariae in the rock pools along the Mediterranean coast, the author examined how the differences in phenotypic plasticity between genders affect sexual dimorphism.
#### Background and problems
1. **Sexual dimorphism**: In animals, there are wide differences in morphology, behavior, and life - history characteristics between different genders. For example, common sexual dimorphism in insects includes sexual bimaturism and sexual size dimorphism, that is, the differences in development time and body size between the two genders.
2. **Existing hypotheses**:
- **Mating opportunity hypothesis**: It is proposed that males mature early to increase mating opportunities, resulting in shorter development time and smaller body size for males, thus forming the sexual dimorphism with larger - sized females.
- **Constraint hypothesis**: It is believed that the selection of larger female body size (related to reproductive capacity) leads to longer development time for females, and then forms the sexual bimaturism phenomenon.
#### Research questions
- **Differences in phenotypic plasticity between genders**: Will changes in environmental conditions lead to differences in phenotypic plasticity of development time and body size between genders?
- **Relationship between sexual bimaturism and sexual size dimorphism**: Will these differences weaken or change the association between sexual bimaturism and sexual size dimorphism?
#### Experimental design
- **Experimental object**: The rock pool mosquito Aedes mariae.
- **Experimental conditions**: Three different treatment conditions were set up:
- **Constant condition (CC)**: Temperature of 26 °C, salinity of 50 ‰.
- **Rising temperature condition (TC)**: 29 °C in the L3 larval stage, 31 °C in the L4 larval stage, and 34 °C in the pupal stage.
- **Decreasing salinity condition (SC)**: Gradually decreasing from 50 ‰ to 0 ‰.
- **Measurement indicators**: Development time, body weight, and morphological characteristics.
#### Main findings
- **Development time**: Under the constant condition, the male development time is shorter, showing sexual bimaturism; but under the rising - temperature or decreasing - salinity conditions, this difference disappears, and males and females mature simultaneously.
- **Body - size differences**: Under all conditions, the female body size is always larger than that of the male, but the rising - temperature and decreasing - salinity conditions significantly change the degree of this difference.
- **Phenotypic plasticity**: The differences in phenotypic plasticity between genders break the traditional association between sexual bimaturism and sexual size dimorphism, indicating that this association is environment - dependent.
#### Conclusions
The results of the paper challenge the existing hypotheses about the association between sexual bimaturism and sexual size dimorphism, emphasizing the important role of environmental conditions in shaping sexual dimorphism patterns. Future research should consider the differences in phenotypic plasticity between genders to more comprehensively understand the evolutionary mechanisms of sexual dimorphism.
Through these studies, the author reveals the important influence of environmental factors on sexual dimorphism patterns and provides a new perspective for understanding the biological adaptation to environmental changes.