Abstract:Targeting recalcitrant individuals may pose a considerable problem if a failure to trigger a trap result in a long‐term and generalised avoidance of devices. We emphasise the importance of accounting for inter‐individual differences in responses to devices, addressing the motivations of recalcitrant individuals during fieldwork and accounting for these differences during data interpretation. The behaviour of vertebrate pests, such as invasive species and nuisance native animals, towards control devices present a major challenge for wildlife managers. Physical devices, such as live capture or kill‐traps, serve as essential management tools, yet the efficacy of these devices can be compromised when some individuals fail to engage with devices, risking the failure of an entire management operation. A more nuanced understanding of how behavioural variability within target populations influences interactions with different device types is needed to improve the detectability of recalcitrant individuals that fail to engage with devices and are subsequently missed by research and management activities. We tested the behavioural responses of 28 wild‐caught stoats Mustela erminea, a highly successful invader in Aotearoa New Zealand, to three devices representing a range of styles commonly used for mesopredator research and management (box trap, tunnel trap and head‐up trap). We assessed the influence of stoat personality, sex and device type on susceptibility to devices (probability and latency to trigger) and found all had independent and interactive effects. In general, stoats which were shyer, less active, less exploratory and less neophiliac (low attraction to novelty) took significantly longer to trigger devices and had significantly lower probabilities of triggering devices. The influence of boldness on the probability of stoats triggering devices during first encounter differed significantly by trap type, and the box and tunnel traps targeted opposite ends of the personality spectrum. Trap recalcitrance (avoidance of the standard control measures) was greatest in shy female stoats and females generally had lower susceptibility to all devices compared to males. Synthesis and applications: Targeting recalcitrant individuals may pose a considerable problem if a failure to trigger a trap result in a long‐term and generalised avoidance of devices. We emphasise the importance of accounting for inter‐individual differences in responses to devices, addressing the motivations of recalcitrant individuals during fieldwork and accounting for these differences during data interpretation.

Do They Know What They Are Doing? Cognitive Aspects of Rescue Behaviour Directed by Workers of the Red Wood Ant Formica polyctena to Nestmate Victims Entrapped in Artificial Snares

Cause, development, function, and evolution: Toward a behavioral ecology of rescue behavior in ants

Ants evade harmful food by active abandonment

Background substrate and nest semiochemicals mediate ant aggression towards a parasitic beetle

Personality, sex and capture biases: Challenges for predator monitoring and management

A Model for Foraging Ants, Controlled by Spiking Neural Networks and Double Pheromones

How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task

Foraging behaviour affects nest architecture in a cross-species comparison of ant nests

Spontaneous helping in pigs is mediated by helper's social attention and distress signals of individuals in need

Catch me if you can: free-living mice show a highly flexible dodging behaviour suggestive of intentional tactical deception

Fine-tuned intruder discrimination favors ant parasitoidism

Agitated ants: regulation and self-organization of incipient nest excavation via collisional cues

Mechanistic modeling of alarm signaling in seed-harvester ants

Family before work: task reversion in workers of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta in the presence of brood

Search and Rescue in a Maze-like Environment with Ant and Dijkstra Algorithms

Optimising Control Device Luring Strategies for Invasive Predator Control: A Modelling Approach

Testing the reality gap with kilobots performing two ant-inspired foraging behaviours

Host following of an ant associate during nest relocation

Polistes dominula spatial learning abilities while foraging

Collective search in ants: Movement determines footprints, and footprints influence movement

A comparative study of navigation behaviours in ants