Association between Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Cohort Studies

Lin Wang,Qingqing Liu,Mulalibieke Heizhati,Xiaoguang Yao,Qin Luo,Nanfang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.023
IF: 7.802
2020-12-01
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a prevalent phenomenon in adults, and although cohort studies have reported an association between EDS and adverse health outcomes, the results are inconclusive. This meta-analysis summarizes the evidence from longitudinal cohort studies on the relationship between EDS and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or all-cause mortality.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Design</h3><p>A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies was conducted.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Setting and Participants</h3><p>We searched for relevant longitudinal cohort studies published through September 2019 using Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, and SciELO.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Measures</h3><p>The relative risk (RR) of EDS was pooled in random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed to identify heterogeneous sources. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg and Egger tests.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Seventeen studies (153,909 participants) were included. The mean follow-up was 5.4 (range, 2–13.8) years. The pooled relative risks of EDS were 1.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–1.50] for total CVD events, 1.28 (95% CI 1.12–1.46) for coronary heart disease (CHD), 1.52 (95% CI 1.10–2.12) for stroke, 1.47 (95% CI 1.09–1.98) for CVD mortality, and 1.23 (95% CI 1.13–1.33) for all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses by mean age, region, follow-up time, EDS assessment method, and year of publication yielded similar results.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>EDS is a modest but statistically significant predictor for CVD events, coronary heart disease, stroke, and CVD and all-cause mortality. However, its prognostic value warrants further investigation to identify those at highest risk of mortality and in need of intervention to improve outcomes.</p>
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?