Abstract:Sea-level rise due to climate change will have significant effects on coastal areas and populations. Adaptation policies recommend the managed realignment of the most vulnerable assets and activities. Despite their medium- and long-term benefits, these policies face significant friction due to social acceptability in the communities where they are implemented. This article investigates the hypothesis that respecting principles of justice in the implementation of managed realignment should increase its acceptability. We compare preferences of those people who are exposed to the risk of climate-change-induced flooding and those who are not, as regards funding managed retreat policies and defining compensation criteria for assets at risk. The main theories of social justice provide the four principles included in the analysis: efficiency, need, responsibility and priority assigned to property rights. A choice experiment survey was conducted with 258 residents of coastal and hinterland communities in the south of France. Four attributes were selected to define the managed realignment policy: the dialogue arrangements, the implementation period, the policy implementation schedule and the cost. The results show support for a relatively fast launch of these policies (within 15 years) but in stages and through a process of dialogue with the population. People's perceptions of the funding criteria reveal a preference for national solidarity. Finally, national funding of managed retreat policies and compensation criteria based on market prices have a significant positive influence on the acceptability of managed realignment policies, whereas introducing responsibility-based compensation criteria tends to favour the status quo over the adaptation policy. Policy relevance Prioritization of the funding criteria reveals the preference for national solidarity. Preferences for the justice criteria underpinning compensation reveal a great diversity of values. Besides implantation modalities, preferences for managed realignment policies depend on which level they are implemented at, on the expropriation criteria (the emphasis given to property rights, i.e. market price), on the attachment (people perceived as worst off, i.e. the property is their main residence rather than a second home or they have lower levels of income) and on the degree of responsibility (related to the date of purchase, i.e. on the information given at the time on the risk).

Choosing to protect: Public support for flood defense over relocation in climate change adaptation

Public preferences for sea-level rise adaptation vary depending on strategy, community, and perceiver characteristics

Adoption of Individual Flood Damage Mitigation Measures in New York City: An Extension of Protection Motivation Theory

Attitudes toward moving or staying and buying flood insurance to face varied flood threats in a floodplain community

Exposing Disparities in Flood Adaptation for Equitable Future Interventions

Exploring the link between flood risk perception and public support for funding on flood mitigation policies

Flood-induced mobility in rural and urban coastal jurisdictions: a homeowner's perspective

Willingness to incur private costs for climate adaptation? Public support for undergrounding electricity transmission lines in California

Impact of justice and solidarity variables on the acceptability of managed realignment

Exposing disparities in flood adaptation for equitable future interventions in the USA

Public attitudes towards flooding and property-level flood protection measures

Divergent Residential Pathways from Flood-Prone Areas: How Neighborhood Inequalities Are Shaping Urban Climate Adaptation

Exploring the Adaptation-mitigation Relationship: Does Information on the Costs of Adapting to Climate Change Influence Support for Mitigation?

Community choices for building resilience and mitigating risks: Retreat versus retrofit

Insights into the complementarity of natural disaster insurance purchases and risk reduction behavior

On the horns of a dilemma: Experts as communicators for property‐level flood risk adaptation measures

To live with floods or not: Intersectionality of drivers of urban households' adaptation and relocation intentions

A comparison of the cost effectiveness of property‐level adaptation and community‐scale flood defences in reducing flood risk

Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities

A question of ‘fit’: local perspectives on top-down flood mitigation policies in Vermont

Trust in science and solution aversion: Attitudes toward adaptation measures predict flood risk perception