Abstract:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive (M+) non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an important subtype of lung cancer comprising 10% to 15% of non‐squamous tumours. This subtype is more common in women than men, is less associated with smoking, but occurs at a younger age than sporadic tumours. To assess the clinical effectiveness of single‐agent or combination EGFR therapies used in the first‐line treatment of people with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR M+ NSCLC compared with other cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTX) agents used alone or in combination, or best supportive care (BSC). The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression‐free survival. Secondary outcomes included response rate, symptom palliation, toxicity, and health‐related quality of life. We conducted electronic searches of the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2020, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1946 to 27th July 2020), Embase (1980 to 27th July 2020), and ISI Web of Science (1899 to 27th July 2020). We also searched the conference abstracts of the American Society for Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology (July 2020); Evidence Review Group submissions to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; and the reference lists of retrieved articles. Parallel‐group randomised controlled trials comparing EGFR‐targeted agents (alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents or BSC) with cytotoxic chemotherapy (single or doublet) or BSC in chemotherapy‐naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB or IV) EGFR M+ NSCLC unsuitable for treatment with curative intent. Two review authors independently identified articles, extracted data, and carried out the 'Risk of bias' assessment. We conducted meta‐analyses using a fixed‐effect model unless there was substantial heterogeneity, in which case we also performed a random‐effects analysis as a sensitivity analysis. Twenty‐two trials met the inclusion criteria. Ten of these exclusively recruited people with EGFR M+ NSCLC; the remainder recruited a mixed population and reported results for people with EGFR M+ NSCLC as subgroup analyses. The number of participants with EGFR M+ tumours totalled 3023, of whom approximately 2563 were of Asian origin. Overall survival (OS) data showed inconsistent results between the included trials that compared EGFR‐targeted treatments against cytotoxic chemotherapy or placebo. Erlotinib was used in eight trials, gefitinib in nine trials, afatinib in two trials, cetuximab in two trials, and icotinib in one trial. The findings of FASTACT 2 suggested a clinical benefit for OS for participants treated with erlotinib plus cytotoxic chemotherapy when compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy alone, as did the Han 2017 trial for gefitinib plus cytotoxic chemotherapy, but both results were based on a small number of participants (n = 97 and 122, respectively). For progression‐free survival (PFS), a pooled analysis of four trials showed evidence of clinical benefit for erlotinib compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.39 ; 583 participants ; high‐certainty evidence). A pooled analysis of two trials of gefitinib versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin showed evidence of clinical benefit for PFS for gefitinib (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.48 ; 491 participants high‐certainty evidence), and a pooled analysis of two trials of gefitinib versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin with pemetrexed maintenance also showed evidence of clinical benefit for PFS for gefitinib (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74, 371 participants ; moderate‐certainty evidence). Afatinib showed evidence of clinical benefit for PFS when compared with chemotherapy in a pooled analysis of two trials (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.53, 709 participants high‐certainty evidence). All but one small trial showed a corresponding improvement in response rate with tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor (TKI) compared to chemotherapy. Commonly reported grade 3/4 adverse events associated with afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib and icotinib monotherapy were rash and diarrhoea. Myelosuppression was consistently worse in the chemotherapy arms; fatigue and anorexia were also associated with some chemotherapies. Seven trials reported on health‐related quality of life and symptom improvement using different methodologies. For each of erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib, two trials showed improvement in one or more indices for the TKI compared to chemotherapy. The quality of evidence was high for the comparisons of erlotinib and gefitinib with cytotoxic chemotherapy and for the comparison of afatinib with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and icotinib are all active agents in EGFR M+ NSCLC patients, and demonstrate an increased tumour response rate and prolonged PFS compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy. We found a beneficial effect of the TKI compared to cytotoxic c -Abstract Truncated-

Mefatinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer harboring rare EGFR mutations.

Mefatinib As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Sensitizing Mutation-Positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Efficacy and Biomarker Study.

Mefatinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase Ib/II efficacy and biomarker study.

P76.28 Phase II Study of the Efficacy of the EGFR Inhibitor Mefatinib in Patients with Advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC

1370Tip Befotertinib Versus Icotinib As First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Phase III Study

Fruquintinib with Gefitinib As First-Line Therapy in Patients Carrying EGFR Mutations with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Single-Arm, Phase II Study

Efficacy and Safety of Befotertinib (D-0316) in Patients with EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC That Had Progressed after Prior EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study.

Detection of EGFR Mutations in Plasma Circulating Tumour DNA As a Selection Criterion for First-Line Gefitinib Treatment in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma (BENEFIT): a Phase 2, Single-Arm, Multicentre Clinical Trial

Study of Gefitinib and Pemetrexed As First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutation

LBA6 Befotertinib (D-0316) Versus Icotinib As First-Line Therapy for Patients with EGFR-mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Study

Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line AZD3759 (zorifertinib) Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in EGFR-mutant (egfrm+) Non–small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastasis.

First-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Afatinib Versus Gefitinib As First-Line Treatment of Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (Lux-Lung 7): a Phase 2B, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Gefitinib Plus Anlotinib for Patients with EGFR Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

OA14 Phase 2 Study: Tepotinib + Gefitinib in MET+/Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (Egfr)-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Randomized controlled trial of chemotherapy plus geiftinib as ifrst-line treatment for patients with advancedEGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma

Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Three Phase IIIb Studies

Effect of Gefitinib Challenge to Initial Treatment with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

P2.01-21 Efficacy and Safety of Combing Anlotinib and Erlotinib As a First-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Efficacy and potential resistance mechanisms of afatinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I

Efficacy and safety of dacomitinib as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor 21L858R mutation: A multicenter, case-series study in China