Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Peritendinous and Intrabursal Corticosteroid Injections on Shoulder Tendon Elasticity: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Po-Cheng Hsu,Ke-Vin Chang,Wei-Ting Wu,Jia-Chi Wang,Levent Özçakar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.011
IF: 4.06
2021-05-01
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objectives</h3><p>The study aimed to investigate whether the shoulder tendons changed their elasticity following ultrasound guided peri-tendinous or intra-bursal corticosteroid injections.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Design</h3><p>Post-hoc secondary analysis of a double-blinded, randomized controlled study with 3 months of follow-up.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Setting</h3><p>Outpatient rehabilitation clinic.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Participants</h3><p>Patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (N=60).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Interventions</h3><p>Patients with unilateral shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive standard ultrasound guided subacromial or dual-target corticosteroid injections. The supraspinatus tendons were exposed to 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide in the formal group, whereas the long head of the biceps brachii tendons (LHBT) and supraspinatus tendons were individually infiltrated by 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide in the latter group. Patients' bilateral shoulder were divided into Group 1 (n=30, receiving standard subacromial injections), Group 2 (n=30, receiving dual-target injections) and Group 3 (n=60, without injections).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Strain ratio of LHBT and supraspinatus tendons using ultrasound elastography.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed no intra-group difference of the strain ratio of the LHBT (<em>p</em> = 0.412 for Group 1; <em>p</em> = 0.936 for Group 2; <em>p</em>= 0.131 for Group 3) and supraspinatus tendon (<em>p</em> = 0.309 for Group 1; <em>p</em> =0.067 for Group 2; <em>p</em>= 0.860 for Group 3) across the three time points. Treating Group 3 as the reference, the linear mixed model revealed no significant changes in tendon elasticity after either the standard subacromial injection (<em>p</em>= 0.205 for the LHBT and <em>p</em>= 0.529 for the supraspinatus tendon) or the dual-target injection (<em>p</em>=0.961 for the LHBT and <em>p</em>= 0.831 for the supraspinatus tendon).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Elasticity of the LHBT and supraspinatus tendons, is unlikely to change after a single dose of peri-tendinous or intra-bursal corticosteroid injections. Future studies with a shorter follow-up interval are needed to validate whether corticosteroid injections can cause transient changes of the tendon's elasticity.</p>
rehabilitation,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?