Abstract:Background Research on electronic health record physiological data is common, invariably including artifacts. Traditionally, these artifacts have been handled using simple filter techniques. The authors hypothesized different artifact detection algorithms, including machine learning, may be necessary to provide optimal performance for various vital signs and clinical contexts. Materials and Methods In a retrospective single center study, intraoperative OR and ICU electronic health record datasets including heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, temperature, and capnometry were included. All records were screened for artifacts by at least two human experts. Classical artifact detection methods (cutoff, multiples of standard deviation (z-value), interquartile range, and local outlier factor) and a supervised learning model implementing long short-term memory neural networks were tested for each vital sign against the human expert reference dataset. For each artifact detection algorithm, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results A total of 106 (53 operating room and 53 ICU) patients were randomly selected, resulting in 392,808 data points. Human experts annotated 5,167 (1.3%) data points as artifacts. The artifact detection algorithms demonstrated large variations in performance. The specificity was above 90% for all detection methods and all vital signs. The neural network showed significantly higher sensitivities than the classic methods for: heart rate (ICU: 33.6%, 95% CI: 33.1–44.6), systolic invasive blood pressure (both in the OR (62.2%, 95% CI: 57.5–71.9) and ICU (60.7%, 95% CI: 57.3–71.8), and temperature in the OR (76.1%, 95% CI: 63.6–89.7). The confidence intervals for specificity overlapped for all methods. Generally, sensitivity was low, with only the z-value for oxygen saturation in the operating room reaching 88.9%. All other sensitivities were less than 80%. Conclusion No single artifact detection method consistently performed well across different vital signs and clinical settings. Neural networks may be a promising artifact detection method for specific vital signs.

Taxonomy and Real-Time Classification of Artifacts During Biosignal Acquisition: A Starter Study and Dataset of ECG

Eye Blink Artifact Detection with Novel Optimized Multi-Dimensional Electroencephalogram Features

Eye Blink Artifact Detection Based on Multi-Dimensional EEG Feature Fusion and Optimization.

ECG Signal Reconstruction Based on Facial Videos Via Combined Explicit and Implicit Supervision.

Artifacts Removing Techniques on EEG Waveforms

An Automatic Cardiac Arrhythmia Classification System with Wearable Electrocardiogram

Automated EEG artifact elimination by applying machine learning algorithms to ICA-based features

A Comparison of 5 Algorithmic Methods and Machine Learning Pattern Recognition for Artifact Detection in Electronic Records of 5 Different Vital Signs: A Retrospective Analysis

[Methods for Processing Physiological Artifacts in Single/Few-Channel EEG Signals]

Hybrid Artifact Detection System for Minute Resolution Blood Pressure Signals from ICU

ECG Biometric Recognition: Review, System Proposal, and Benchmark Evaluation

Intelligent Method for Real-Time Portable EEG Artifact Annotation in Semiconstrained Environment Based on Computer Vision.

AnyECG: Foundational Models for Electrocardiogram Analysis

How Much Data is Enough? Optimization of Data Collection for Artifact Detection in EEG Recordings

State-of-the-art EEG artifact removal evaluation

[Removal of Artifacts from EEG Signal].

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms With Advanced Feature Extraction for ECG Signal Classification

ARTIST: A fully automated artifact rejection algorithm for single‐pulse TMS‐EEG data

EOG Artifact Removal from Single and Multi-channel EEG Recordings through the combination of Long Short-Term Memory Networks and Independent Component Analysis

A Novel Method for Automatic Identification of Motion Artifact Beats in ECG Recordings

AnEEG: leveraging deep learning for effective artifact removal in EEG data