Abstract:Background Managing ovarian lesions requires differentiating between benign and malignant cases. The development of a multiparametric MRI approach combining anatomical and functional criteria has led to the creation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI scoring system, which enhances diagnostic accuracy. Objectives To study ovarian lesions and their characteristics, along with their risk stratification based on MRI O-RADS. Methods A prospective study used the O-RADS MRI criteria to categorize ovarian lesions. Clinical findings and MRI results were compared with histopathological outcomes to assess diagnostic accuracy. Results We identified abdominal pain as the most prevalent clinical finding among our cases (64, 91.43%), followed by a lump in the abdomen (33, 47.5%), dysmenorrhea (33, 47.5%), bleeding per vaginal (15, 21.43%), and weight loss (11, 15.71%). A total of 80 ovarian lesions were examined and characterized on the basis of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system. Among the 80 ovarian lesions, 54 were histopathologically confirmed ovarian lesions (39 (72.22%) were benign, and 15 (27.77%) were malignant). The most common benign lesions were ovarian serous cystadenoma (28.20%) and ovarian mucinous cystadenoma (20.51%), while the most common malignant lesions were serous carcinoma (33.33%) and mucinous carcinoma (20%). Using the O-RADS MRI scoring system, we categorized six lesions (7.5%) as O-RADS 1 (all benign), 34 lesions (42.50%) as O-RADS 2 (32 benign and 2 malignant), 24 lesions (30%) as O-RADS 3 (23 benign and 1 malignant), seven lesions (8.75%) as O-RADS 4 (four benign and three malignant), and nine lesions (11.25%) as O-RADS 5 (all malignant). Our findings revealed significant differences in the size of lesions, the presence of thick septa, high T2-weighted signal intensity within solid tissue, and patterns of solid component enhancement and wall irregularity between malignant and benign lesions. The MRI cut-off score of ≥4 for malignancy demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.59%, a specificity of 97.5%, an accuracy of 97.62%, a positive predictive value of 94.5%, and a negative predictive value of 97.5%. The positive likelihood ratio was 32.7, while the negative likelihood ratio was 0.025. These results affirm the high diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS MRI scoring system in distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Conclusion The O-RADS MRI score is a highly accurate tool for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Its application can significantly enhance the management and treatment outcomes for patients with adnexal masses. The study confirms the scoring system's high sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy.

MR Imaging–Pathologic Correlation in Ovarian Cancer

MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis

Multimodality Imaging Approach to Ovarian Neoplasms with Pathologic Correlation

CT and MR Imaging of Ovarian Tumors with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis

MR Imaging of Germ Cell and Sex Cord Stromal Tumors

Characterization of Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Developing an MR Imaging Strategy for Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses

Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Categorization of Ovarian Epithelial Cancer and Survival Analysis with Focus on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value: Correlation with Ki-67 Expression and Serum Cancer Antigen-125 Level

Imaging Strategy for Early Ovarian Cancer: Characterization of Adnexal Masses with Conventional and Advanced Imaging Techniques

Application of CT Scan in Diagnosis of Pathological Type and Origin of Metastatic Ovarian Tumors

Update on Imaging of Ovarian Cancer

Primary versus Secondary Ovarian Malignancy: Imaging Findings of Adnexal Masses in the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Study

MRI Evaluation and Characterization of Ovarian Lesions Based on Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI

MRI, CT, and PET/CT for Ovarian Cancer Detection and Adnexal Lesion Characterization

Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma

Role of MRI in Pre-Operative Assessment of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Candidate for Cytoreductive Surgery, A Brief Review

Differentiation of epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes by use of imaging and clinical data: a detailed analysis

Progress of MRI Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumor

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics in Categorizing Ovarian Masses and Predicting Clinical Outcome: a Preliminary Study.

MRI characteristics of ovarian metastasis: differentiation from stomach and colorectal cancer