SETD2 loss and ATR inhibition synergize to promote cGAS signaling and immunotherapy response in renal cell carcinoma

Xian-De Liu,Yan-Ting Zhang,Daniel J McGrail,Xuesong Zhang,Truong Lam,Anh Hoang,Elshad Hasanov,Ganiraju Manyam,Christine B Peterson,Haifeng Zhu,Shwetha V Kumar,Rehan Akbani,Patrick G Pilie,Nizar M Tannir,Guang Peng,Eric Jonasch,Daniel J. McGrail,Christine B. Peterson,Shwetha V. Kumar,Patrick G. Pilie,Nizar M. Tannir
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1003
IF: 13.801
2023-08-02
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Purpose: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) demonstrates durable clinical benefits in a minority of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We aimed to identify the molecular features that determine the response and develop approaches to enhance the response. Experimental Design: We investigated the effects of SET domain-containing protein 2 (SEDT2) loss on the DNA damage response pathway, the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway, the tumor immune microenvironment, and the response to Ataxia telangiectasia and rad3 related (ATR) and checkpoint inhibition in RCC. Results: ATR inhibition activated the cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS)-Interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3)-dependent cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, resulting in the concurrent expression of inflammatory cytokines and immune checkpoints. Among the common RCC genotypes, SETD2 loss is associated with preferential ATR activation and sensitizes cells to ATR inhibition. SETD2 knockdown promoted the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway in response to ATR inhibition. Treatment with the ATR inhibitor VE822 concurrently upregulated immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression in Setd2 knockdown Renca tumors, providing a rationale for ATR inhibition plus ICB combination therapy. Setd2 deficient Renca tumors demonstrated greater vulnerability to ICB monotherapy or combination therapy with VE822 than Setd2 proficient tumors. Moreover, SETD2 mutations were associated with a higher response rate and prolonged overall survival in ICB-treated RCC patients but not in non-ICB-treated RCC patients. Conclusions: SETD2 loss and ATR inhibition synergize to promote cGAS signaling and enhance immune cell infiltration, providing a mechanistic rationale for the combination of ATR and checkpoint inhibition in RCC patients with SETD2 mutations.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?