Artificial intelligence for diagnosing and predicting survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma: Retrospective multi-center study

Siteng Chen,Xiyue Wang,Jun Zhang,Liren Jiang,Ning Zhang,Feng Gao,Wei Yang,Jinxi Xiang,Sen Yang,Junhua Zheng,Xiao Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04889
2023-01-12
Image and Video Processing
Abstract:Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal-related tumor with high heterogeneity. There is still an urgent need for novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ccRCC. Methods: We proposed a weakly-supervised deep learning strategy using conventional histology of 1752 whole slide images from multiple centers. Our study was demonstrated through internal cross-validation and external validations for the deep learning-based models. Results: Automatic diagnosis for ccRCC through intelligent subtyping of renal cell carcinoma was proved in this study. Our graderisk achieved aera the curve (AUC) of 0.840 (95% confidence interval: 0.805-0.871) in the TCGA cohort, 0.840 (0.805-0.871) in the General cohort, and 0.840 (0.805-0.871) in the CPTAC cohort for the recognition of high-grade tumor. The OSrisk for the prediction of 5-year survival status achieved AUC of 0.784 (0.746-0.819) in the TCGA cohort, which was further verified in the independent General cohort and the CPTAC cohort, with AUC of 0.774 (0.723-0.820) and 0.702 (0.632-0.765), respectively. Cox regression analysis indicated that graderisk, OSrisk, tumor grade, and tumor stage were found to be independent prognostic factors, which were further incorporated into the competing-risk nomogram (CRN). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses further illustrated that our CRN could significantly distinguish patients with high survival risk, with hazard ratio of 5.664 (3.893-8.239, p < 0.0001) in the TCGA cohort, 35.740 (5.889-216.900, p < 0.0001) in the General cohort and 6.107 (1.815 to 20.540, p < 0.0001) in the CPTAC cohort. Comparison analyses conformed that our CRN outperformed current prognosis indicators in the prediction of survival status, with higher concordance index for clinical prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?