Clinical outcomes associated with neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of resectable non‐small cell lung cancer in real‐world practice

Xiaojie Huang,Guanchao Pang,Zhirong Mao,Baizhou Li,Zhihua Teng,Yan Yang,Zijian Qiu,Xiuxiu Chen,Pingli Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13761
2024-05-03
The Clinical Respiratory Journal
Abstract:The present study evaluated and compared the efficacy of different neoadjuvant therapeutic modalities in patients with operable NSCLC (non‐small cell lung cancer) in a real‐world setting. The results demonstrated that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy yields better effects in terms of pathologic response and disease‐free survival compared with chemotherapy or immunotherapy alone. This regimen does not increase the risk of adverse events or hinder surgical resection. Background In order to improve survival outcomes in resectable non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), strategies for neoadjuvant therapy need to be revisited. We evaluated and compared the efficacy of different neoadjuvant therapeutic modalities in a real‐world setting. Methods A total of 258 patients with clinical stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC was included. All the patients underwent surgical resection after one to four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment consisting of chemotherapy (83), immunotherapy (23), and immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (152). Results The radiologic response rate in the combined immunochemotherapy group was 67.8%, higher than that of 48.2% in the chemotherapy group and 4.3% in the immunotherapy group (p
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?