Phase 2 study of dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma
Andrew D. Norden,Glenn J. Lesser,Jan Drappatz,Keith L. Ligon,Samantha N. Hammond,Eudocia Q. Lee,David R. Reardon,Camilo E. Fadul,Scott R. Plotkin,Tracy T. Batchelor,Jay-Jiguang Zhu,Rameen Beroukhim,Alona Muzikansky,Lisa Doherty,Debra Lafrankie,Katrina Smith,Vida Tafoya,Rosina Lis,Edward C. Stack,Myrna R. Rosenfeld,Patrick Y. Wen,A. D. Norden,G. J. Lesser,J. Drappatz,K. L. Ligon,S. N. Hammond,E. Q. Lee,D. R. Reardon,C. E. Fadul,S. R. Plotkin,T. T. Batchelor,J.-J. Zhu,R. Beroukhim,A. Muzikansky,L. Doherty,D. Lafrankie,K. Smith,V. Tafoya,R. Lis,E. C. Stack,M. R. Rosenfeld,P. Y. Wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not040
2013-04-03
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Among patients with glioblastoma (GBM) who progress on standard temozolomide, the optimal therapy is unknown. Resistance to temozolomide is partially mediated by O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Because MGMT may be depleted by prolonged temozolomide administration, dose-intense schedules may overcome resistance.METHODS: This was a multicenter, phase 2, single-arm study of temozolomide (75-100 mg/m(2)/day) for 21 days of each 28-day cycle. Patients had GBM in first recurrence after standard therapy. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6).RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants were accrued, 3 of whom were ineligible for analysis; one withdrew before response assessment. There were 33 men (61%), with a median age of 57 years (range, 25-79 years) and a median Karnofsky performance score of 90 (range, 60-100). Of 47 patients with MGMT methylation results, 36 (65%) had methylated tumors. There were 7 (13%) partial responses, and PFS6 was only 11%. Response and PFS did not depend on MGMT status; MSH2, MLH1, or ERCC1 expression; the number of prior temozolomide cycles; or the time off temozolomide. Treatment was well tolerated, with limited grade 3 neutropenia (n = 2) or thrombocytopenia (n = 2).CONCLUSIONS: Dose-intense temozolomide on this schedule is safe in recurrent GBM. However, efficacy is marginal and predictive biomarkers are needed.
oncology,clinical neurology