Abstract:Information stored in the memory system can affect visual search process. Foreknowing features of distractors could facilitate target selection. Previous studies found that after sufficient practice, participants learned to ignore fixed feature representations in working memory (WM) when they reappeared as distractors. However, varied WM representations would automatically capture attention, suggesting that we could not voluntarily inhibit varied WM representations. Current studies investigated whether active-maintained varied representations could be suppressed as those fixed representations. In study 1, participants were requested to find a specific shape (target) in the search array and indicate the location of a dot inside the target. The fixed color-cue in each trial indicated that target would not be among shapes in the cued color. Meanwhile, there was a constant color, which would never be the target (and never appeared as cue color) during the entire experiment. In negative-cue condition, distractor color in search array was the cue color, while the target color was randomly selected. In constant color condition, distractor color was the constant color which was a long-term memory (LTM) representation. In neutral condition, both target color and distractor color were randomly selected with the restriction that they would never be the cue color nor the constant color. We found that, compared to neutral conditions, both fixed WM representations and LTM representations could facilitate visual search. In study 2, we varied the cue in each trial. Results showed that reaction time (RT) of negative-cue condition was significantly shorter than neutral condition when reaction speed was slow. Importantly, even in fast RT condition, there was no capture effect. In all, our results indicated that participants could voluntarily suppress both fixed and varied WM representations when they reappeared as distractors. However, facilitation of varied representation only happened when cognitive control process had sufficient time to execute.

Distraction from long-term memory in visual search: Acquired procedural and template-based memory interfere with contextual cueing after target re-location

Environmental regularities mitigate attentional misguidance in contextual cueing of visual search.

Visual Search May Not Require Target Representation in Working Memory or Long-Term Memory.

When experience with scenes foils attentional orienting: ERP evidence against flexible target-context mapping in visual search

Effects of Location-based and Object-based Selective Attention in Visual Target Detection Tasks

Contextual cueing of visual search reflects the acquisition of an optimal, one-for-all oculomotor scanning strategy

Contextual cueing in older adults: Slow initial learning but flexible use of distractor configurations

Task-based memory systems in contextual-cueing of visual search and explicit recognition

Memory-based Attentional Guidance Facilitates Visual Search Through Distractor Suppression

Contextual cuing survives an interruption from an endogenous cue for attention

Mechanisms of contextual cueing: A tutorial review

Contextual facilitation: Separable roles of contextual guidance and context suppression in visual search

Contextual cueing in preview search

Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages

Measuring learning and attention to irrelevant distractors in contextual cueing.

Task-Irrelevant Context Learned Under Rapid Display Presentation: Selective Attention in Associative Blocking

Intact Contextual Cueing for Search in Realistic Scenes with Simulated Central or Peripheral Vision Loss

Memory Guidance in Distractor Suppression is Governed by the Availability of Cognitive Control

Contextual Cueing Effect in Spatial Layout Defined by Binocular Disparity

Spatial predictive context speeds up visual search by biasing local attentional competition

Contextual Cueing Effect Under Rapid Presentation