Abstract:The dynamic response characteristics of aircraft are inherently nonlinear. Traditionally, flight control systems have been designed using aircraft models that have been linearized at various flight conditions, with the control parameters scheduled with respect to aircraft configuration and flight condition. In order to guarantee the stability and performance of the resulting gain-scheduled closed-loop systems, linear parameter-varying (LPV) control techniques have been developed as an alternative to classically-designed controllers that do not offer stability guarantees across the entire envelope. This work compares classical proportional-integral-derivative, robust H∞, and LPV control design methods. Three different controllers are designed for the longitudinal flight dynamics of an F-16 aircraft within a defined flight envelope. The primary design objective is model-following of the commanded pitch rate. The desktop analysis and simulation are given here in Part I to quantitatively assess the performance of each controller. A piloted simulation study is given in Part II to gather qualitative pilot ratings and comments to validate or refute the results and conclusions which were based on the preliminary desktop analysis. I. Introduction LIGHT control engineering can be broken into two distinct but inherently interrelated subdivisions: control design and analysis and the study of aircraft handling qualities. Control designers and analysts focus mostly on the vehicle itself. Different control methods are developed and implemented to ensure a robust and well-performing system considering only the end-to-end vehicle response as the primary performance metric. Handling qualities engineers, however, are concerned with the pilot-vehicle system. It is the pilot who is the outermost feedback mechanism of a flight control system, and it is in this loop where aircraft stability and performance should be measured. The metrics used to gauge pilot-vehicle system performance are sometimes subjective; pilot ratings of handling qualities and tendency of the aircraft to enter a pilot-induced oscillation when performing a task are two qualitative measurements of pilot opinion. These qualitative assessments are used in combination with the quantitative metrics derived from flight test data to assess the validity of the preliminary desktop analysis and ultimately determine the goodness of a design. Though the theories used to design and analyze control systems have advanced in the past fifty years 1 , the control methods and architectures employed on many modern aircraft have remained largely the same. Classical proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control systems are the standard for most aircraft due to their simple structure. Today, the existence of heavily instrumented test aircraft allows for complex control systems to be simulated in flight. In recent years, robust design methods, such as H∞ control, have been employed in an attempt to address the problem of aircraft instability in flight due to the lack of robustness offered by classical control. These techniques

Practical System Identification and Incremental Control Design for a Subscale Fixed-Wing Aircraft

Commonalities between Robust Hybrid Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion and Proportional-Integral- Derivative Flight Control Law Design

An Integrated Controller Design for a Small Aero-Engine

Stability and Performance Analysis for SISO Incremental Flight Control

Adaptive Control of Novel Configuration with Moving Mass

Robust Proportional Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control of a Flying-Wing Tailsitter

Incremental filtered nonlinear control for aircraft with actuator dynamics compensation

Development of flight control system for 2D differential geometric guidance and control problem

PI(D) tuning for Flight Control Systems via Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion

Parameter Tuning Approach for Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion-Based Flight Controllers

Incremental Control and Guidance of Hybrid Aircraft Applied to a Tailsitter UAV

Incremental control system design and flight tests of a micro-coaxial rotor UAV

Unified Control of Flight Dynamics and Actuators Using Local Accelerations

Piloted Simulation Study Comparing Classical, H-Infinity, and Linear Parameter-Varying Control Methods

State-space model identification and feedback control of unsteady aerodynamic forces

Boosted Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Flexible Airplane Gust Load Alleviation

Comparison of Classical, H?, and LPV Flight Control Design Methods, Part I: Desktop Analysis

Nonlinear Incremental Control for Flexible Aircraft Trajectory Tracking and Load Alleviation

Unified incremental nonlinear controller for the transition control of a hybrid dual-axis tilting rotor quad-plane

Adaptive PI Control Based Stability Margin Configuration of Aircraft Control Systems with Unknown System Parameters and Time Delay

Adaptive finite-time incremental backstepping fault-tolerant control for flying-wing aircraft with state constraints