Process scores on measures of learning and memory: Issue 1

Dustin B. Hammers,Matthew Calamia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2307219
2024-01-25
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Abstract:As most clinical neuropsychologists can attest, interpretation of summary scores from multi-trial learning and memory measures have long been a staple of clinical evaluations. These scores include the total information recalled immediately while learning presented stimuli, and the information recalled after a delay. Relatively recently, increased consideration has been paid to the process used by a patient to acquire the material. In essence, understanding "how" a patient learns can also shed light onto clinical condition and – importantly – potential response to behavioral intervention. A host of learning and memory "process scores" – methods to understand patterns of performance – have been developed, including those examining the impact of order of stimuli presentation (e.g., serial position effect), the proportions of stimuli recalled or forgotten, the frequencies of repetition or intrusions, and the degree of benefit from clustering stimuli. When considering such research, it is important to highlight that advocating for the use of process scores does not imply that their use should take the place of traditional summary metrics; instead, they can be used to complement learning and memory summary scores to aid in clinical decision making.
psychology, clinical,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?