Integration of metabolomics and proteomics analysis to explore the mechanism of neurotoxicity induced by receipt of isoniazid and rifampicin in mice

Xiaoyu Qu,Jie Ma,Huan Gao,Yueming Zhang,Jinghui Zhai,Jiawei Gong,Yanqing Song,Tingting Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2022.11.004
IF: 4.398
2022-11-07
NeuroToxicology
Abstract:Isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) are co-administered in tuberculosis treatment but can cause neurotoxicity, and the mechanism is not known. To explore this mechanism, we employed an integrated approach using metabolomics analysis (MA) and proteomics analysis (PA). Male mice were divided into three groups and administered vehicle (control group), or co-administered INH (120 mg/kg) and RIF (240 mg/kg), for 7 or 14 days. Mice brains were collected for mass spectrometry-based PA and MA plus lipidomics analysis. Measurement of brain levels of malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase revealed time-dependent brain injury after exposure to INH+RIF for 7 and 14 days. Also, 422 proteins, 35 metabolites, and 21 lipids were dysregulated and identified. MA demonstrated "purine metabolism," "phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis," "biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids," "phenylalanine metabolism," and "arginine biosynthesis" to be disturbed significantly. PA demonstrated pathways such as "lipids," "amino acids," and "energy metabolism" to be disrupted. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pathways were changed in energy metabolism, which led to the neurotoxicity induced by INH+RIF. Immunohistochemical analyses of PPARs in mice brains verified that PPAR-α and -γ expression was downregulated. PPAR-α and -γ activation might be a key target for alleviating INH+RIF-induced neurotoxicity.
pharmacology & pharmacy,neurosciences,toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?