Abstract:Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation, are advocated as measures to enable causal inference in cognitive neuroscience experiments. Transcending the limitations of purely correlative neuroimaging measures and experimental sensory stimulation, they allow to experimentally manipulate brain activity and study its consequences for perception, cognition, and eventually, behavior. Although this is true in principle, particular caution is advised when interpreting brain stimulation experiments in a causal manner. Research hypotheses are often oversimplified, disregarding the underlying (implicitly assumed) complex chain of causation, namely, that the stimulation technique has to generate an electric field in the brain tissue, which then evokes or modulates neuronal activity both locally in the target region and in connected remote sites of the network, which in consequence affects the cognitive function of interest and eventually results in a change of the behavioral measure. Importantly, every link in this causal chain of effects can be confounded by several factors that have to be experimentally eliminated or controlled to attribute the observed results to their assumed cause. This is complicated by the fact that many of the mediating and confounding variables are not directly observable and dose–response relationships are often nonlinear. We will walk the reader through the chain of causation for a generic cognitive neuroscience NIBS study, discuss possible confounds, and advise appropriate control conditions. If crucial assumptions are explicitly tested (where possible) and confounds are experimentally well controlled, NIBS can indeed reveal cause–effect relationships in cognitive neuroscience studies.

Controlling human causal inference through in silico task design

Causal inference on human behaviour

Building Object-based Causal Programs for Human-like Generalization

Learning Causal Overhypotheses through Exploration in Children and Computational Models

Active Learning for Optimal Intervention Design in Causal Models

Towards Understanding How Machines Can Learn Causal Overhypotheses

Integrating Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference: A Novel Approach in Online Experiments

Inhibitory Behavioral Control: A Stochastic Dynamic Causal Modeling Study Using Network Discovery Analysis

Importance of prefrontal meta control in human-like reinforcement learning

The Causal-Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inference

Predicting and Shaping Human-Machine Interactions in Closed-loop, Co-adaptive Neural Interfaces

Causal Curiosity: RL Agents Discovering Self-supervised Experiments for Causal Representation Learning

Causal Inference in Generalizable Environments: Systematic Representative Design

Computer-Aided Experiment Planning Toward Causal Discovery in Neuroscience

An Introduction to Causal Inference Methods for Observational Human-Robot Interaction Research

Causal Inference for Human-Language Model Collaboration

On the Sensitivity of Reward Inference to Misspecified Human Models

Learning domain-specific causal discovery from time series

Inferring Causality from Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience