Abstract:Abstract Background Studies investigating the prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression (PPD) have used different definitions. Some studies have used a high score on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to define PPD, whereas others have used information on antidepressant medication use and/or diagnostic information on treatment for depression at a psychiatric hospital. We wanted to compare results using these two approaches to evaluate to what degree results can be compared. Moreover we wanted to evaluate, whether use of EPDS or PPAT (defined below) leads to identification of different risk factor profiles. Methods We identified women who delivered a child between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016 in Copenhagen or in one of the municipalities that were part of the Danish Health Visitors’ Child Health Database. The potential risk factors were demographic factors and pregnancy- and obstetrical events. Outcomes of interest were an EPDS score ≥ 13, use of antidepressants (ATC: N06A) and/or a diagnosis of depression (F32) within six months after birth. Use of antidepressants and/or diagnosis of depression will be referred to as postpartum antidepressant treatment (PPAT). Agreement between EPDS ≥ 13 and PPAT was evaluated by the kappa coefficient. Associations between risk factors and the two outcomes (EPDS ≥ 13 and PPAT) were estimated by risk ratios (RR) using log-linear binomial regression. Presence of a systematic difference between RRs based on EPDS ≥ 13 (RR EPDS≥13 ) and PPAT (RR PPAT ) was evaluated in a meta-regression approach weighted by inverse-variance and with logarithm of the RRs as outcome. Results The estimated PPD prevalence using EPDS ≥ 13 was 3.2% and of PPAT 0.4%. The agreement between the two measures was small (Kappa = 0.08), but their risk factor profile was very similar with no systematic difference between them. Conclusions Using the two different methods of case identification produced different prevalence estimates, but a similar risk factor profile. The differences in estimated prevalence and low agreement suggest that the two measures identify different potential PPD cases and using only one of the methods in defining PPD would underestimate PPD prevalence. The similar risk factor profile suggests that the considered risk factors are involved in the general development of PPD.

Comparative analysis of the performance of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale with two other depression instruments

Postpartum Depression Screening Scale: development and psychometric testing

Further validation of the postpartum depression screening scale

Postpartum depression as profiled through the depression screening scale

Postpartum depression screening scale (PDSS)

Combined Use of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to Identify Antenatal Depression among Chinese Pregnant Women with Obstetric Complications

Concordance and discordance of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in an ethnically diverse sample

Screening tools for postpartum depression: validity and cultural dimensions.

Screening performance of the postpartum depression screening scale—Spanish version

Detection of Postnatal Depression

The many faces of postpartum depression

An empirical comparison of statistical methods for multiple cut-off diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) depression screening tool using published results vs individual participant data

A quantitative comparison of two measures of postpartum depression

Overestimation of postpartum depression prevalence based on a 5-item version of the EPDS: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Screening methods for postpartum depression

Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data

Application research on subscales of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in psychological screening of high risk pregnant women

Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and …

Relationship between Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Scores in the Early Postpartum Period and Related Stress Coping Characteristics

Comparison of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Whooley questions in screening for postpartum depression in Japan

Validation of the culturally adapted Edinburgh postpartum depression scale among east Asian, southeast Asian and south Asian populations: A scoping review