Abstract:Abstract Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms are successfully applied in many real-world multiobjective optimization problems. As for many other AI methods, the theoretical understanding of these algorithms is lagging far behind their success in practice. In particular, previous theory work considers mostly easy problems that are composed of unimodal objectives. As a first step towards a deeper understanding of how evolutionary algorithms solve multimodal multiobjective problems, we propose the OneJumpZeroJump problem, a bi-objective problem composed of two objectives isomorphic to the classic jump function benchmark. We prove that the simple evolutionary multiobjective optimizer (SEMO) with probability one does not compute the full Pareto front, regardless of the runtime. In contrast, for all problem sizes n and all jump sizes k∈[4..n2-1], the global SEMO (GSEMO) covers the Pareto front in an expected number of Θ((n-2k)nk) iterations. For k=o(n), we also show the tighter bound 32enk+1±o(nk+1), which might be the first runtime bound for an MOEA that is tight apart from lower-order terms. We also combine the GSEMO with two approaches that showed advantages in single-objective multimodal problems. When using the GSEMO with a heavy-tailed mutation operator, the expected runtime improves by a factor of at least kΩ(k). When adapting the recent stagnation-detection strategy of Rajabi and Witt (2022) to the GSEMO, the expected runtime also improves by a factor of at least kΩ(k) and surpasses the heavy-tailed GSEMO by a small polynomial factor in k. Via an experimental analysis, we show that these asymptotic differences are visible already for small problem sizes: A factor-5 speed-up from heavy-tailed mutation and a factor-10 speed-up from stagnation detection can be observed already for jump size 4 and problem sizes between 10 and 50. Overall, our results show that the ideas recently developed to aid single-objective evolutionary algorithms to cope with local optima can be effectively employed also in multiobjective optimization.

Analysis of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms On Fitness Function With Time-Linkage Property

Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms on Fitness Function with Time-linkage Property

A Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for Finding Pareto Optimal Set in Multi-Objective Optimization

Towards Running Time Analysis of Interactive Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

Theoretical Analyses of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms on Multimodal Objectives

A Dynamic Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Pareto Set Linkage and Prediction

Running Time Analysis of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) using Binary or Stochastic Tournament Selection

Analyzing algorithmic strategy on multi- objective evolutionary algorithms

A New MOEA for Multi-Objective TSP and Its Convergence Property Analysis

Better Running Time of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) by Using Stochastic Tournament Selection

Theoretical Analyses of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms on Multi-Modal Objectives

Performance Scaling Of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

A Primary Theoretical Study on Decomposition-Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms

Large-Scale Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization

Two-Stage Multi-Objective Evolution Strategy for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization

An Improved Multiobjective Optimization Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition for Complex Pareto Fronts.

A new simple and highly efficient multi-objective optimal evolutionary algorithm

An Analysis on Recombination in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization

MOEA/UE: A Novel Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Using a Uniformly Evolving Scheme

Multiobjective Optimization Based on Coevolutionary Algorithm

A Survey on Search Strategy of Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms