Abstract:Background: Integrated care can be broadly defined as the delivery of high-quality and safe care for patients as they cross organizational boundaries or when care is delivered with multiple health care teams, professions, or organizations. Successful integration of care services is contingent on multiple and complex factors across macro, meso, and micro levels of health and social care systems in lower-, middle-, and higher-income countries. Previous priorities for the future development of integrated care have focused on designing and implementing models or approaches to integrated care rather than establishing the research needed to underpin them. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by developing a consensus on international research priorities related to integration of care and cross-boundary working. Methods: We conducted a sequential electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study from September 2023 to December 2023. The eDelphi process consisted of initial priority generation followed by two rounds of consensus development via an online survey. Sixty-six priorities were generated by 19 delegates at an international conference workshop titled, 'Priority setting for future research on integration of care and cross-boundary working'. Workshop delegates then identified other experts in integrated care and cross-boundary working from their networks. In each eDelphi round, participants then provided item-by-item responses using a seven-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree). Priorities that reached consensus were conceptually grouped into topics. Results: Twenty-five of 66 unique (37.9%) research priorities achieved consensus after two eDelphi rounds. In Round 1, 63/85 (74.1%) experts from 10 countries across 4 continents achieved consensus on 12/66 (18.2%) priorities. In Round 2, 51/63 (81.0%) experts achieved consensus on a further 13/54 (24.1%) priorities. From the 25 priorities, we derived six conceptual groupings that represent broad topics for future research on integrated care and cross-boundary working: (i) access to care, (ii) data sharing and technology, (iii) measurement of care quality, (iv) patient experience and satisfaction, (v) service design, integration and governance, and (vi) teamwork and leadership. Conclusion: Integrating care services and improving cross-boundary working is important for improving the quality of care provided to patients, regardless of country. Therefore, the conceptual topics and individual priorities identified in this study can inform policymakers, practitioners, and researchers when designing or evaluating integrated care services across the world in pursuit of improved integrated care systems.

Setting Regional Priorities for Palliative and End-of-Life Care Research Using a Delphi Technique Approach

International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study

Developing research priorities for palliative care in Colombia: a priority setting partnership approach

Regional anaesthesia research priorities: a Regional Anaesthesia UK (RA‐UK) priority setting partnership involving patients, carers and healthcare professionals

Development of a palliative paramedicine framework to standardise best practice: A Delphi study

Identification of core indicators for the integration of a palliative care approach in hospitals: An international Delphi study

Using a modified Delphi method to identify research priorities in an Australian regional health service

Priorities and opportunities for palliative and end of life care in United Kingdom health policies: a national documentary analysis

Overarching Priorities for Health and Care Research in the United Kingdom: A Coproduced Synthesis of James Lind Alliance 'Top 10s'

Using the Delphi technique to achieve consensus on bereavement care in palliative care in Europe: An EAPC White Paper

Is end-of-life care a priority for policymakers? Qualitative documentary analysis of health care strategies

Palliative psychiatry: research, clinical, and educational priorities

Research priorities associated with family caregivers in palliative care: international perspectives

Palliative care research in Africa: consensus building for a prioritized agenda

Revised recommendations on standards and norms for palliative care in Europe from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC): A Delphi study

Priorities for paediatric critical care research: a modified Delphi study by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group

Region-specific macro-indicators for palliative care development in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a Delphi study

Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments

Organizing palliative care for rural populations: a systematic review of the evidence

Finding a way with words: Delphi study to develop a discussion prompt list for paediatric palliative care

Development of a national quality framework for palliative care in a mixed generalist and specialist care model: A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique