Abstract:Plain English summaryCystic fibrosis (CF) is the commonest life-limiting inherited disorder in the UK. It affects many parts of the body including the lungs and gut leading to increased infection and problems digesting food. People with CF need to undergo many treatments each day throughout their whole lives. These include tablets, inhalers and breathing exercises, which are a huge burden, taking up several hours every dayIt is therefore, really important that the treatments we give are supported by good evidence, usually gathered from clinical trials. Unfortunately, we do not have good evidence for many of the CF treatments. We recently ran an exercise known as a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (JLA PSP) to find out which the CF community feel are the top priority research questions. People with CF and those who look after them suggested questions to be answered by clinical trials. Through a series of online surveys and workshops these were then shortlisted to give a final top ten.Due to infection risk people with CF are advised not to mix, this meant we had to do things differently to the usual way JLA PSPs are carried out. We used videoconferencing to enable multiple people with CF to participate. Surveys were accessible online and promoted through social media.AbstractBackgroundThe James Lind Alliance (JLA) method is well recognised for setting research priorities. The JLA approach involves a combination of surveys and workshop interactions between patients, carers and health care professionals to identify and agree on a “top ten” list of research questions. Respiratory infection is one of the hallmarks of cystic fibrosis (CF). To avoid cross infection, patients are advised not to meet face to face, preventing us following standard JLA methodology. Here we describe adaptations made during our recent JLA Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) in CF.MethodsWe elicited and prioritised research questions, using sequential online surveys, promoted through social media. People with CF participated in steering committee meetings and the final workshop, using videoconferencing. Alterations to workshop methodology enabled participants attending in person and those joining remotely, to contribute equally. We also altered the JLA methodology to include “lone” questions, asked by only one survey respondent. We are now working with the CF community to co-produce research projects that answer these top ten.ResultsThere were 482 respondents, from 23 countries, who submitted 1080 questions. Increases in the number of responses occurred just after promotion on social media. Use of videoconferencing enabled participation of multiple people with CF and ensured participation from anywhere in the world, including hospital inpatients. Inclusion of lone questions resulted in one being included in our top ten.ConclusionsThere is no “one-size-fits-all” for patient involvement methodologies. Through altering the JLA methods to fit our patient group we achieved wide participation. We believe that methods used in our project may also be applied to future partnerships to increase participation, especially where people may be hospitalised or be unable to travel. The methodology we are developing through the JLA PSP CF2 project may be useful for other PSPs to follow.

Prioritizing sexual and reproductive health research and care for people with cystic fibrosis: A 2023 workshop report from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Sexual Health, Reproduction, and Gender (SHARING) Research Working Group

(264) Prioritizing Sexual and Reproductive Health Research and Care for People with Cystic Fibrosis: A 2023 Workshop Report From the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Sexual Health, Reproduction, and Gender Research (SHARING) Working Group

The top 10 research priorities in cystic fibrosis developed by a partnership between people with CF and healthcare providers

Optimizing sexual reproductive health of men and women with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review

Men's sexual health among men with cystic fibrosis: an opportunity for quality improvement?

Reproductive health needs of adolescent and young adult women with pediatric rheumatic diseases

What effective ways of motivation, support and technologies help people with cystic fibrosis improve and sustain adherence to treatment?

Health System Research Priorities for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor and mental health: A workshop report from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation's Prioritizing Research in Mental Health working group

Fertility preservation in women with cystic fibrosis pre‐lung transplantation: A mixed methods study

(375) Assessing Infertility Literacy and Knowledge Gaps Amongst Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis foundation position paper: Redefining the CF care model

Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis

Research priorities for childhood chronic conditions: a workshop report

Adapting the cystic fibrosis care model: Perspectives from people with CF, caregivers, and members of CF care teams

Intimacy and sexual life of females with cystic fibrosis

Priority setting: women's health topics in multiple sclerosis

Exploring the complexity of cystic fibrosis (CF) and psychosocial wellbeing in the 2020s: Current and future challenges

Going to the Source: Discussions With Early and Mid-Career Faculty From Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research to Develop and Enhance CFAR Services

Taking lead from the community: What do young people living with HIV want us to research?

Standards for the care of people with cystic fibrosis (CF); recognising and addressing CF health issues