Social Participation of People with Chronic Mental Health Needs: Building Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Social Capital

Gianfranco Giuntoli,Karen R. Fisher,Peri O’Shea,Christiane Purcal,Fredrick Zmudzki,Olivia Dwyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9975449
2024-01-02
Health & Social Care in the Community
Abstract:Social participation is positively related to mental health recovery and wellbeing, yet people with mental health problems are often socially isolated. This article investigates how social participation was incorporated into an Australian-integrated program that aimed to improve the wellbeing of people with chronic mental health needs. The data are from a longitudinal evaluation of the integrated program, including data linkage (5533 participants) and interviews (111). The paper uses concepts from the network perspective of social capital (bonding, bridging, linking, horizontal, and vertical) as lenses to re-examine the evaluation’s findings about the consumers’ social participation in life areas (social, leisure, and productive) facilitated by the program. This social capital perspective offers a lens to examine the breadth and intensity of participation experienced by the consumers taking part in the support program. The article adds to the literature about how service providers can improve social participation and therefore consumers’ opportunities for recovery and wellbeing. The analyses found that the support increased people’s social interaction and their capacity in the community. Their social interaction was mostly with other people in the service. Often their interactions in the community were only transactional. Few consumers participated in activities in productive life areas, and few of the activities promoted vertical social capital in social networks outside the service. The implications are that service providers need greater attention on facilitating a variety of social participation activities that can extend mental health consumers’ horizontal and vertical social capital and so further contribute to their current and future recovery and wellbeing.
public, environmental & occupational health,social work
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is: how to improve the social capital of people with chronic mental health needs through social participation, thereby promoting their recovery and well-being. Specifically, the paper explores how service providers in an integrated program in Australia help these populations build horizontal and vertical forms of social capital by promoting participation in social, recreational, and productive life domains. ### Background of the Paper 1. **The Relationship Between Social Participation and Mental Health Recovery**: - Social participation has a positive impact on mental health recovery and well-being. - People with mental health issues often face challenges of social isolation. 2. **Research Objectives**: - To evaluate the social participation in an integrated program in Australia aimed at improving the well-being of people with chronic mental health needs. - To reanalyze the results of the program evaluation using the concept of social capital from a social network perspective (including bonding, bridging, and linking social capital). ### Research Methods 1. **Data Sources**: - Long-term evaluation data, including data links from 5533 participants and interviews with 111 participants. - Evaluation methods include quantitative data analysis and qualitative interviews. 2. **Analytical Framework**: - Using the concept of social capital from a social network perspective (bonding, bridging, linking, horizontal, and vertical social capital) to analyze the social participation of consumers. ### Main Findings 1. **Types of Support and Their Impact**: - **Social and Recreational Support**: - **Group Activities**: Promoted horizontal connections among consumers but failed to generate strong bonding social capital. Many activities were limited to within the program, and some consumers felt participation in these activities was mandatory. - **Community Participation**: Had a significant impact on consumers' well-being but was mainly limited to temporary and incidental interactions, failing to generate strong bonding or bridging social capital. - **Maintenance or Restoration of Family Relationships**: Helped consumers rebuild family connections but had limited effects. - **Productive Support**: - **Education, Training, and Supported Employment**: Helped consumers improve skills and employability, but participation was low and did not effectively promote the generation of vertical social capital. ### Conclusion 1. **Aspects Service Providers Need to Focus On**: - Provide diverse social participation activities to expand the horizontal and vertical social capital of people with mental health needs. - Focus on non-transactional interactions in the community to promote deeper social connections. - Support consumers' independent mobility to increase their participation in the community. 2. **Significance of the Research**: - Provides recommendations for service providers to improve social participation and support strategies to further promote the recovery and well-being of patients. Through these findings, the paper provides important insights and recommendations on how to improve the social capital of people with chronic mental health needs through social participation.