Can auxiliary indicators improve COVID-19 forecasting and hotspot prediction?

Daniel J. McDonald,Jacob Bien,Alden Green,Addison J. Hu,Nat DeFries,Sangwon Hyun,Natalia L. Oliveira,James Sharpnack,Jingjing Tang,Robert Tibshirani,Valérie Ventura,Larry Wasserman,Ryan J. Tibshirani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111453118
IF: 11.1
2021-12-13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Validated forecasting methodology should be a vital element in the public health response to any fast-moving epidemic or pandemic. A widely used model for predicting the future spread of a temporal process is an autoregressive (AR) model. While basic, such an AR model (properly trained) is already competitive with the top models in operational use for COVID-19 forecasting. In this paper, we exhibit five auxiliary indicators—based on deidentified medical insurance claims, self-reported symptoms via online surveys, and COVID-related Google searches—that further improve the predictive accuracy of an AR model in COVID-19 forecasting. The most substantial gains appear to be in quiescent times; but the Google search indicator appears to also offer improvements during upswings in pandemic activity.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?