Abstract:Abstract Background To compare the dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), secondary cancer complication probabilities (SCCP), and excess absolute risk (EAR) differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for left-sided breast cancer after mastectomy. Methods and materials Thirty patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) were randomly enrolled in this study. Both IMRT and VMAT treatment plans were created for each patient. Planning target volume (PTV) doses for the chest wall and internal mammary nodes, PTV1, and PTV of the supraclavicular nodes, PTV2, of 50 Gy were prescribed in 25 fractions. The plans were evaluated based on PTV1 and PTV2 coverage, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index, conformity number (CN), dose to organs at risk, NTCP, SCCP, EAR, number of monitors units, and beam delivery time. Results VMAT resulted in more homogeneous chest wall coverage than did IMRT. The percent volume of PTV1 that received the prescribed dose of VMRT and IMRT was 95.9 ± 1.2% and 94.5 ± 1.6%, respectively ( p < 0.001). The HI was 0.11 ± 0.01 for VMAT and 0.12 ± 0.02 for IMRT, respectively ( p = 0.001). The VMAT plan had better conformity (CN: 0.84 ± 0.02 vs. 0.78 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) in PTV compared with IMRT. As opposed to IMRT plans, VMAT delivered a lower mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (11.5 Gy vs 12.6 Gy) and heart (5.2 Gy vs 6.0 Gy) and significantly reduced the V 5 , V 10 , V 20, V 30, and V 40 of the ipsilateral lung and heart; only the differences in V 5 of the ipsilateral lung did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.409). Although the volume of the ipsilateral lung and heart encompassed by the 2.5 Gy isodose line (V 2.5 ) was increased by 6.7% and 7.7% ( p < 0.001, p = 0.002), the NTCP was decreased by 0.8% and 0.6%, and SCCP and EAR were decreased by 1.9% and 0.1% for the ipsilateral lung. No significant differences were observed in the contralateral lung/breast V 2.5 , V 5, V 10 , V 20 , mean dose, SCCP, and EAR. Finally, VMAT reduced the number of monitor units by 31.5% and the treatment time by 71.4%, as compared with IMRT. Conclusions Compared with IMRT, VMAT is the optimal technique for PMRT patients with left-sided breast cancer due to better target coverage, a lower dose delivered, NTCP, SCCP, and EAR to the ipsilateral lung and heart, similar doses delivered to the contralateral lung and breast, fewer monitor units and a shorter delivery time.

Dosimetric benefit and clinical feasibility of deep inspiration breath-hold and volumetric modulated arc therapy-based postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer

Immobilization-assisted Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold in Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Internal Mammary Chain Coverage

Application of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Postoperative Radiotherapy for Left-Side Breast Cancer

Three-Year Outcome Evaluation Of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique In Post-Radiation Therapy Patients After Left-Sided Breast-Conserving Surgery By Echocardiography With Quantitative Tissue Velocity Imaging

Abdominal DIBH reduces the cardiac dose even further: a prospective analysis

The Benefits Evaluation Of Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Based On Knowledge-Based Radiotherapy Treatment Planning For Left-Sided Breast Cancer

A dosimetric comparison of the tangential beams IMRT with multifield beams IMRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer recurrent patients

A volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) combined with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique for adjuvant irradiation for left sided breast cancer

Dosimetric Comparison for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy on the Left-Sided Chest Wall and Internal Mammary Nodes Irradiation in Treating Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Right Breast Cancer with Regional Nodal Irradiation Utilizing the Surface-Guided Radiotherapy Based Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique on a TrueBeam HD Linear Accelerator: A Case Report

How Effective is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Minimizing Cardiac Doses During Hybrid Radiotherapy Treatment for Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Comprehensive Regional Nodes?

A dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of VMAT following mastectomy for patients with left-sided breast cancer

Dosimetry of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer and hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Deep inspiration breath hold: dosimetric benefits to decrease cardiac dose during postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer patients

Dose advantage of abdominal deep inspiratory breath-hold (aDIBH) in postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for left breast cancer

Impact of deep inspiration breath hold, surface-guided radiotherapy, and daily CBCT on the organs at risk in breast cancer radiotherapy

Comparison of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Versus Free Breathing in Radiotherapy for Left Sided Breast Cancer

Impact of Positioning Errors on the Dosimetry of Breath-Hold-Based Volumetric Arc Modulated and Tangential Field-in-Field Left-Sided Breast Treatments

VMAT with DIBH in hypofractionated radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: results of a non-inferiority clinical study

Dosimetric and radiobiological advantages from deep inspiration breath-hold and free breath technique for left-sided breast radiation using 3DCRT, IMRT and Rapid Arc methods-a complete assessment

Dosimetric Comparison of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Plans for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer, Including Regional Lymph Node Irradiation