Quantitative analysis of health insurance reform in China: Pure consolidation or universal health insurance?

Kun Cui,Bo Li,Hanyang Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105550

IF: 4.7

2021-08-01

Economic Modelling

Abstract:<p>We quantify the macroeconomic and welfare effects of a social health insurance reform that occurred in China in 2016 using a two-sector model with endogenous rural-to-urban migrant workers. The calibrated model mimics the rural-to-urban migration and rural-urban wage gap from 2007 through 2016. We find that the health insurance reform depresses rural-to-urban migration and leads to reallocation of labor and capital in both the rural and urban sectors. As the result, we find that the consolidation of premium and reimbursement expands the rural-urban wage gap by approximately 6.8% but universal health insurance coverage narrows the rural-urban wage gap by approximately 0.9%. Keeping the government deficit unchanged, the welfare results favor universal health insurance relative to pure consolidation.</p>

economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the impact of China's 2016 social health insurance reform on the macroeconomy and welfare. Specifically, the authors quantify the effects of this reform on rural-to-urban migration, the urban-rural wage gap, health insurance deficits, and social welfare through a two-sector model (rural and urban sectors).

### Main Research Questions:
1. **Rural-to-urban migration**: How does the reform affect the migration of rural labor to urban areas?
2. **Urban-rural wage gap**: How does the reform affect the wage gap between urban and rural areas?
3. **Health insurance deficit**: How does the reform affect the deficit in the health insurance sector?
4. **Social welfare**: How does the reform affect overall social welfare?

### Research Background:
- **Fragmentation of the urban-rural social health insurance system**: China has long had a fragmented urban-rural social health insurance system, making it difficult for the rural population to access medical insurance, thereby increasing their economic burden.
- **Insurance gap for rural-to-urban migrant workers**: A large number of rural-to-urban migrant workers are in a blank state in the social health insurance system and cannot enjoy the medical insurance of urban residents.
- **2016 Health Insurance Reform**: In 2016, the Chinese government issued guidelines to integrate the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) and the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI) to address the above issues and establish universal health insurance coverage.

### Model and Methods:
- **Two-sector model**: The authors extend the model of Hayashi and Prescott (2008) by incorporating endogenous rural-to-urban migrant workers.
- **Baseline model**: In the baseline model, urban workers enjoy urban wages and urban health insurance, rural workers enjoy rural wages and rural health insurance, while rural-to-urban migrant workers receive urban wages but do not have social health insurance.
- **Numerical experiments**: The authors conducted two numerical experiments, simulating the reform of unifying premiums and reimbursement standards (pure integration) and the reform of universal health insurance allowing migrant workers to reimburse across regions.

### Main Findings:
- **Pure integration reform**:
- Suppressed rural-to-urban migration by about 7.3%.
- Increased the urban-rural wage gap by about 6.8%.
- Increased the health insurance deficit by about 11.9%.
- Decreased social welfare by about 2.5%.
- **Universal health insurance reform**:
- Suppressed rural-to-urban migration by about 1.8%.
- Reduced the urban-rural wage gap by about 0.9%.
- Increased the health insurance deficit by about 46.8%.
- Increased social welfare by about 4.4%.

### Conclusion:
- **Social welfare**: Under budget neutrality, the universal health insurance reform is more beneficial compared to the pure integration reform, as it can improve social welfare.
- **Policy recommendations**: To enhance social welfare, the government should prioritize implementing universal health insurance reform rather than merely integrating premiums and reimbursement standards.

This paper provides important references for evaluating the macroeconomic and welfare effects of China's health insurance reform through quantitative analysis.