Periodic Discharges And Status Epilepticus: A Critical Reappraisal

Francesco Misirocchi,Pia De Stefano,Alessandro Zilioli,Elisa Mannini,Stefania Lazzari,Carlotta Mutti,Lucia Zinno,Liborio Parrino,Irene Florindo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.018
IF: 4.861
2024-05-09
Clinical Neurophysiology
Abstract:Objective Periodic Discharges (PDs) in Status Epilepticus (SE) are historically related to negative outcome, and the Epidemiology-based Mortality Score in SE (EMSE) identifies PDs as an EEG feature associated with unfavorable prognosis. However, supportive evidence is conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of interictal PDs during and following SE. Methods All 2020-2023 non-hypoxic-ischemic SE patients with available EEG during SE were retrospectively assessed. Interictal PDs during SE (SE-PDs) and PDs occurring 24-72h after SE resolution (post-SE-PDs) were examined. In-hospital death was defined as the primary outcome. Results 189 SE patients were finally included. SE-PDs were not related to outcome, while post-SE-PDs were related to poor prognosis confirmed after multiple regression analysis. EMSE global AUC was 0.751 (95%CI:0.680-0.823) and for EMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.85, specificity 0.52, accuracy 63%. We recalculated EMSE score including only post-SE-PDs. Modified EMSE (mEMSE) global AUC was 0.803 (95%CI:0.734-0.872) and for mEMSE-64 cutoff sensitivity was 0.84, specificity 0.68, accuracy 73%. Conclusion Interictal PDs during SE were not related to outcome whereas PDs persisting or appearing >24h after SE resolution were strongly associated to unfavorable prognosis. EMSE performed well in our cohort but considering only post-SE-PDs raised specificity and accuracy for mEMSE64 cutoff. Significance This study supports the utility of differentiating between interictal PDs during and after SE for prognostic assessment.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?