Abstract:Objectives: Visual and contextual cues facilitate speech recognition in suboptimal listening conditions (e.g., background noise, hearing loss, hearing aid signal processing). Moreover, successful speech recognition in challenging listening conditions is linked to cognitive abilities such as working memory and fluid intelligence. However, it is unclear which cognitive abilities facilitate the use of visual and contextual cues in individuals with normal hearing and hearing aid users. The first aim was to investigate whether individuals with hearing aid users rely on visual and contextual cues to a higher degree than individuals with normal hearing in a speech-in-noise recognition task. The second aim was to investigate whether working memory and fluid intelligence are associated with the use of visual and contextual cues in these groups. Design: Groups of participants with normal hearing and hearing aid users with bilateral, symmetrical mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss were included (n = 169 per group). The Samuelsson and Rönnberg task was administered to measure speech recognition in speech-shaped noise. The task consists of an equal number of sentences administered in the auditory and audiovisual modalities, as well as without and with contextual cues (visually presented word preceding the sentence, e.g.,: "Restaurant"). The signal to noise ratio was individually set to 1 dB below the level obtained for 50% correct speech recognition in the hearing-in-noise test administered in the auditory modality. The Reading Span test was used to measure working memory capacity and the Raven test was used to measure fluid intelligence. The data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects modeling. Results: Both groups exhibited significantly higher speech recognition performance when visual and contextual cues were available. Although the hearing aid users performed significantly worse compared to those with normal hearing in the auditory modality, both groups reached similar performance levels in the audiovisual modality. In addition, a significant positive relationship was found between the Raven test score and speech recognition performance only for the hearing aid users in the audiovisual modality. There was no significant relationship between Reading Span test score and performance. Conclusions: Both participants with normal hearing and hearing aid users benefitted from contextual cues, regardless of cognitive abilities. The hearing aid users relied on visual cues to compensate for the perceptual difficulties, reaching a similar performance level as the participants with normal hearing when visual cues were available, despite worse performance in the auditory modality. It is important to note that the hearing aid users who had higher fluid intelligence were able to capitalize on visual cues more successfully than those with poorer fluid intelligence, resulting in better speech-in-noise recognition performance.

Fluid Intelligence Partially Mediates the Effect of Working Memory on Speech Recognition in Noise

Working Memory Asymmetrically Modulates Auditory and Linguistic Processing of Speech.

Relationships Between Hearing Status, Cognitive Abilities, and Reliance on Visual and Contextual Cues

Working Memory and Intelligibility of Hearing-Aid Processed Speech

On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds

Is Having Hearing Loss Fundamentally Different? Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling of the Effect of Cognitive Functioning on Speech Identification

Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise

Processing of Visual Speech Cues in Speech-in-Noise Comprehension Depends on Working Memory Capacity and Enhances Neural Speech Tracking in Older Adults With Hearing Impairment

Study of Speech Recognition in Noise and Working Memory in Adults and Elderly with Normal Hearing

The contribution of short-term memory for sound features to speech-in-noise perception and cognition

Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners.

Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study

Working memory predicts long-term recognition of auditory sequences: Dissociation between confirmed predictions and prediction errors

Relationship Between Working Memory, Compression, and Beamformers in Ideal Conditions

Cognitive Hearing Science: Three Memory Systems, Two Approaches, and the Ease of Language Understanding Model

ASSOCIATIONS OF AUDIOMETRIC HEARING, BRAIN MRI, AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE WITH SPEECH-IN-NOISE PERFORMANCE

A structural equation mediation model captures the predictions amongst the parameters of the ease of language understanding model

Contribution of Auditory Working Memory to Speech Understanding in Mandarin-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users.

Speech-in-noise detection is related to auditory working memory precision for frequency

The relationship between auditory brainstem responses, cognitive ability, and speech-in-noise perception among young adults with normal hearing thresholds

Working Memory As a Partial Mediator of the Relationship Between Multilingualism and Foreign Language Aptitude