Abstract:Our integrated modelling method allows for managers to use citizen sightings combined with detection/non‐detection surveys to estimate robust indices of abundance for both high‐ and low‐density, and wide‐spread versus patchily distributed species. Through comparison with previous studies, we highlight how broad‐scale programmes, such as the statewide efforts to estimate species distributions undertaken here, can benefit substantively from integrated models that leverage additional data (here, incidental records) from a larger region of space, and thus capture more landscape heterogeneity than is plausible within formalized surveys alone. Estimating species distribution and abundance is foundational to effective management and conservation. Using an integrated species distribution model that combines presence‐only data from various sources with detection/non‐detection data from structured surveys, we estimated the distribution and expected abundance of three difficult‐to‐monitor mammals of management concern across New York State, namely, coyotes (Canis latrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus) and black bears (Ursus americanus). Three distinct landscape‐scale camera trap surveys provided detection/non‐detection data over 9 years between 2013 and 2021, and we augmented those data with incidental records of our focal species from public repositories. We used an inhomogeneous Poisson point process to construct an integrated model that fit both data types simultaneously. We demonstrate a simple application of spatial point density of all species records in the accessed public databases to inform the thinning process to account for unknown spatial sampling in the presence‐only data, often referred to as the 'magic covariate'. Using this approach, we examine habitat associations and provide spatially explicit estimates in expected abundance across the entirety of New York State for all three focal species. As expected, coyotes were the most widely distributed and abundant species, with a strong positive association with agricultural land uses. Bobcats exhibited low expected abundance throughout the state and showed positive associations with deciduous forest and forest edge, and a negative association with road density. Finally, we observed considerable spatial variation in abundance of black bears with expected abundance increasing in association with various forest cover and composition covariates and decreasing with crop cover. We present insights into habitat associations and spatial variation in abundance, and provide management implications for each of the species of interest. Synthesis and applications. Our integrated modelling method allows for managers to use citizen sightings combined with detection/non‐detection surveys to estimate robust indices of abundance for both high‐ and low‐density, and wide‐spread versus patchily distributed species. Through comparison with previous studies, we highlight how broad‐scale programmes, such as the statewide efforts to estimate species distributions undertaken here, can benefit substantively from integrated models that leverage additional data (here, incidental records) from a larger region of space, and thus capture more landscape heterogeneity than is plausible within formalized surveys alone.

Quantifying Wildlife Abundance: Negative Rayleigh Modeling of Line Transect Data

AbundanceR: A Novel Method for Estimating Wildlife Abundance Based on Distance Sampling and Species Distribution Models

Animal abundance estimation in independent observer line transect surveys

Performance of unmarked abundance models with data from machine‐learning classification of passive acoustic recordings

Estimation in Independent Observer Line Transect Surveys for Clustered Populations

PRECISION AND BIAS OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POINT SURVEY DETECTION PROBABILITIES

Modelling species abundance using the Poisson-Tweedie family

Measurement Errors in Line Transect Surveys

A Penalized Empirical Likelihood Approach for Estimating Population Sizes under the Negative Binomial Regression Model

Estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations: accounting for imperfect detection and other sources of zero inflation

Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance

A hierarchical model combining distance sampling and time removal to estimate detection probability during avian point counts

Using camera traps and N‐mixture models to estimate population abundance: Model selection really matters

Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models

Wildlife density estimation by distance sampling: A novel technique with movement compensation

Integrating presence‐only and detection/non‐detection data to estimate distributions and expected abundance of difficult‐to‐monitor species on a landscape‐scale

Non-detection during excursions by citizen scientists modeled as a function of weather, season, list length, and individual preferences

Movement-based models for abundance data

Using mobile acoustic monitoring and false‐positive N‐mixture models to estimate bat abundance and population trends

Estimation bias under model selection for distance sampling detection functions

Improved state-space models for inference about spatial and temporal variation in abundance from count data