Abstract:Introduction Divided narratives pose long‐standing difficulties in physician and patient communication. In decision‐making on cancer treatment, divided narratives between physicians and patients hinder mutual understanding and agreement over the illness and its treatment. For effective decision‐making on treatments, it is necessary to investigate the similarities and differences in these divided narratives. Methods This study adopted a qualitative research design of narrative inquiry to examine the data, which included interviews with 32 cancer patients and 16 paired physicians in two hospitals in China. Data analysis was conducted using grounded theory to generate findings. Results Both physicians and patients were concerned about goals and obstacles to their decision‐making on cancer treatment. Four common aspects of goal setting were identified from the divided narratives: decision pools, treatment goals, identity practice and preferred identity. Four common obstacles were identified: pains and trust, communication gap, financial issues and complex family. However, the meanings attached to these eight aspects differed between physicians and patients. Conclusion Cancer treatment decision‐making is an encounter of the scientific world and lifeworld. A divided narrative approach can identify the similarities and differences in the decision‐making on cancer treatment between physicians and patients. Physicians generally adopt a rational decision‐making approach, whereas patients generally adopt a relational decision‐making approach. Despite the common concerns in their goals and obstacles, physicians and patients differed in their contextualized interpretations, which demonstrates the physicians' and the patients' pursuit of preferred identities in decision‐making. The results of this study provide a new perspective to treatment decision‐making, emphasizing the importance of narrative integration in reaching mutual agreement. Patient and Public Contribution The findings were shared with 15 cancer patients and caregivers for feedback and advice in June 2024. This study was also presented at the international conferences of COMET (International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Communication, Medicine, and Ethics) and ICCH (International Conference on Communication in Healthcare) 2023 for continuous feedback and comments.

Navigating shared decision-making after the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act: a qualitative study of in-depth interviews with terminal cancer patients, families, and healthcare professionals

Issues and implications of the life-sustaining treatment decision act: comparing the data from the survey and clinical data of inpatients at the end-of-life process

Analysis of Cancer Patient Decision-Making and Health Service Utilization after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act in Korea

ISSUES OF LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT DECISION ACT IN CLINICAL PRACTICE FOR INDIVIDUALS AT THE END OF LIFE

The focus on life-prolonging anticancer treatment hampers shared decision-making in people with advanced cancer: A qualitative embedded multiple-case study

The Situation of Life-Sustaining Treatment One Year after Enforcement of the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life in Korea: Data of National Agency for Management of Life-Sustaining Treatment

Unpacking the relationship between shared decision-making and decisional quality, decision to screen, and screening completion in lung cancer screening

Shared decision-making needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital: a multi-level, mixed-methods study

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis

Overcoming Challenges to Surrogate Decision Making for Young Adults at the End of Life

Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

Unravelling complex choices: multi-stakeholder perceptions on dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care in kidney disease

Decision-making conflicts regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological neoplasms: A descriptive qualitative study

Shared decision making after severe stroke—How can we improve patient and family involvement in treatment decisions?

Changes in Pediatric End-of-Life Process After the Enforcement of the Act on Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions—The Experience of a Single Children's Hospital

The experience of surrogate decision‐making and deciphering critically ill patient values: A qualitative study

The Encounter of Two Worlds: Divided Narratives of Decision‐Making on Cancer Treatment Between Physicians and Patients

Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study

Role of Law in End-of-Life Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients, Substitute Decision-Makers and Families

Chinese familial tradition and Western influence: a case study in Singapore on decision making at the end of life

Embodied decisions unfolding over time: a meta-ethnography systematic review of people with cancer's reasons for delaying or declining end-of-life care