Prognostic significance of novel muscle quality index utilization in hospitalized adults with cancer: A secondary analysis

Jarson P. da Costa Pereira,Carla M. Prado,M. Cristina Gonzalez,Poliana C. Cabral,Francisco F. de Oliveira Guedes,Alcides da Silva Diniz,Ana P. T. Fayh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2701
2024-11-07
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Abstract:Background This study aimed to investigate and propose novel approaches to calculate muscle quality index (MQI) using muscle mass derived from single‐frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SF‐BIA) and calf circumference in both unadjusted and body mass index (BMI)–adjusted forms. In addition, we examined their prognostic significance in patients with cancer. Methods A secondary analysis was conducted on a prospective cohort study of patients with cancer. Handgrip strength was measured. SF‐BIA was conducted to estimate appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST, in kilograms). MQI was calculated using three approaches: (1) the ratio of handgrip strength to ALST (MQISF‐BIA), (2) the ratio of handgrip strength to calf circumference (MQIcalf circumference), and (3) the ratio of handgrip strength to BMI‐adjusted calf circumference (MQIadj. calf circumference). Maximally selected log‐rank was calculated to estimate their cutoff values to predict survival. Results Two hundred eighty‐four patients were included (51.1% men; median age, 61 years). Solid tumors were the most frequent (89.8%). All approaches to MQI (MQISF‐BIA, MQIcalf circumference, and MQIadj. calf circumference) were independent predictors of 6‐month mortality. The found cutoffs were (1) MQISF‐BIA (<1.52 for men, <0.63 for women), (2) MQIcalf circumference (<0.74 for men, <0.24 for women), and (3) MQIadj. calf circumference (<0.75 for men, <0.25 for women). Conclusion This study introduces MQISF‐BIA, MQIcalf circumference, and MQIadj. calf circumference as future potential surrogate methods for computing MQI in clinical practice when other robust procedures are unavailable, pending further validation.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?