Abstract:Introduction. Inappropriate use of antibiotics and inadequate therapeutic regimens for early-stage pulmonary infections are major contributors to increased prevalence of complications and mortality. Moreover, due to the limitations in sensitivity of conventional testing, there is an urgent need for more diagnostically efficient methods for the detection and characterization of pathogens in pulmonary infections. Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) can contribute to the diagnosis and management of pulmonary infections. Aim. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application and value of mNGS in the diagnosis of clinically suspected pulmonary infections by comparing with conventional testing. Methodology. In this study, the diagnosis performance of mNGS was evaluated using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples from 143 patients with suspected lung infections. First, we conducted a prospective study on 31 patients admitted to Yuebei People's Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College to investigate the clinical value. Then a retrospective analysis was performed by including more patients ( n =112) to reduce the random error. Pathogens were detected by mNGS and conventional methods (culture and PCR). Then, the types and cases of detected pathogens, as well as the specificity and sensitivity, were compared between the two methods. We evaluated the performance of mNGS in detecting bacterial, fungal, viral and mixed infections in BALF. The effect of disease severity in pulmonary infections on the integrity of mNGS pathogen detection was also explored. Results. The mNGS provided an earlier and more comprehensive pathogen profile than conventional testing, which in turn prompted a change in clinical medication, which led to improvement in eight patients (8/31=25.81 %) in the presence of other serious comorbidities. In a retrospective analysis, mNGS was much more sensitive than conventional testing in the diagnosis of pulmonary infections (95.33 % vs. 55.56 %; P <0.001), with a 39.77 % increase in sensitivity. The detection rate of mNGS for mixed infections was significantly higher than that of conventional testing methods for both common and severe pneumonia (48/67=71.64 % vs. 12/52=23.08 %, P <0.001; 44/59=74.58 % vs. 11/59=18.64 %, P <0.0001). Conclusion. The sensitivity of mNGS in the diagnosis of pathogenic microorganisms in pulmonary infections far exceeds that of conventional culture tests. As a complementary method to conventional methods, mNGS can help improve the diagnosis of pulmonary infections. In addition, mNGS pathogen integrity detection rate was similar in common and severe pneumonia. We recommend the prompt use of mNGS when mixed or rare pathogen infections are suspected, especially in immunocompromised individuals and/or critically ill individuals.

A Retrospective Paired Comparison Between Untargeted Next Generation Sequencing and Conventional Microbiology Tests With Wisely Chosen Metagenomic Sequencing Positive Criteria

Utilizing metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection and diagnosis in lower respiratory tract infections in real-world clinical practice

Advancing Microbe Detection for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection Diagnosis and Management with Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing

A single-center, retrospective study of hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections: clinical assessment of metagenomic next-generation sequencing and identification of risk factors in patients

Diagnostic performance of metagenomic sequencing in patients with suspected infection: a large-scale retrospective study

Comparative Performance of Three Next-Generation Sequencing Techniques in Real Clinical Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

A Microbial World: Could Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Be Involved in Acute Respiratory Failure?

Illumina and Nanopore sequencing in culture-negative samples from suspected lower respiratory tract infection patients

Assessing the Quality of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection in Lower Respiratory Infections

Comparison of next-generation sequencing with traditional methods for pathogen detection in cases of lower respiratory tract infection at a community hospital in Eastern China

Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Infection in Intensive Care Unit and Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients

Diagnosis value of targeted and metagenomic sequencing in respiratory tract infection

Microbiological diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing compared with conventional culture for patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Comparison of metagenomic next-generation sequencing using cell-free DNA and whole-cell DNA for the diagnoses of pulmonary infections

Application of the second-generation sequencing technology of metagenomics in the detection of pathogens in respiratory patients

Etiology of lower respiratory tract in pneumonia based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a retrospective study

Improving pulmonary infection diagnosis with metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Comparative analysis of metagenomic and targeted next-generation sequencing for pathogens diagnosis in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens

Assessment and clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for suspected lower respiratory tract infections

The Microbiological Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Infectious Diseases.

Comparison of quality/quantity mNGS and usual mNGS for pathogen detection in suspected pulmonary infections